|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Clinical Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3,
Kasumi-cho, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
2 Imaging Application Tech Center, GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Tokyo,
Japan.
3 Department of Radiology, Mazda Hospital, Mazda Motor Corporation, Hiroshima,
Japan.
4 Department of Radiology, Division of Medical Intelligence and Informatics,
Programs for Applied Biomedicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences,
Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
OBJECTIVE. High reproducibility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is a key requirement for monitoring the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The purposes of this study were to compare electron beam CT and 16-MDCT scanners in the variability of repeated CAC measurements and to assess the factors influencing this variability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. CAC models of different sizes attached to a cardiac phantom with a programmable variable heart rate were scanned three times, and interscan variability of the CAC measurement was calculated each time. For helical CT, different slice-thickness images of either retrospective ECG-gated or prospective ECG-triggering reconstruction were obtained. The detection of small amounts of calcium, variability of the Agatston score, and CAC measurement algorithms (Agatston, volume, and mass scores) were compared between CT scanners and protocols.
RESULTS. All 1-mm-sized calcium models were detected on 0.625- and 1.25-mm helical CT, whereas some were missed on electron beam CT and 2.5-mm helical CT. Retrospective ECG-gated thin-slice helical CT showed the lowest variability. Reduction of variability by volume and mass scoring algorithms was less effective on 0.625- and 1.25-mm-thickness CT.
CONCLUSION. Retrospective ECG-gated thin-slice helical CT has the potential to be a useful tool for monitoring coronary atherosclerosis.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Budoff, R. L. McClelland, H. Chung, N. D. Wong, J. J. Carr', M. M. Gray, R. S. Blumenthal, and R. C. Detrano Reproducibility of Coronary Artery Calcified Plaque with Cardiac 64-MDCT: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 613 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Barraclough, L. A. Stevens, L. Er, D. Rosenbaum, J. Brown, P. Tiwari, and A. Levin Coronary artery calcification scores in patients with chronic kidney disease prior to dialysis: reliability as a trial outcome measure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3199 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Fei, X. Du, Q. Yang, Y. Shen, P. Li, J. Liao, and K. Li 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography: Phantom Study of Effects of Vascular Attenuation on Detection of Coronary Stenosis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-T. Wu, P. Yang, Y.-L. Huang, J.-S. Chen, C.-C. Chuo, C. Yeh, and R.-S. Chang Coronary Arterial Calcification on Low-Dose Ungated MDCT for Lung Cancer Screening: Concordance Study with Dedicated Cardiac CT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 923 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Horiguchi, M. Kiguchi, C. Fujioka, Y. Shen, R. Arie, K. Sunasaka, and K. Ito Radiation Dose, Image Quality, Stenosis Measurement, and CT Densitometry Using ECG-Triggered Coronary 64-MDCT Angiography: A Phantom Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 315 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wexler What Is the Value of Measuring Coronary Artery Calcification? Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rutten, I. Isgum, and M. Prokop Coronary Calcification: Effect of Small Variation of Scan Starting Position on Agatston, Volume, and Mass Scores Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 90 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Horiguchi, C. Fujioka, M. Kiguchi, Y. Shen, C. E. Althoff, H. Yamamoto, and K. Ito Soft and Intermediate Plaques in Coronary Arteries: How Accurately Can We Measure CT Attenuation Using 64-MDCT? Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 981 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schlosser, P. Hunold, T. Voigtlander, A. Schmermund, and J. Barkhausen Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Influence of Reconstruction Interval and Reconstruction Increment Using 64-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1063 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |