|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Thoracic Imaging, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1250 E Marshall St., Main Bldg., 3rd Fl., PO Box 980615, Richmond, VA 23298-0615.
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to estimate the effective radiation dose to the female breast during CT pulmonary angiography compared with other routine diagnostic imaging techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the demographic data of patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography between May 2000 and December 2002, the diagnostic yield of those studies, and the estimated effective radiation dose to the breast incurred during CT. The estimated effective radiation dose was calculated using the ImPACT CT (Impact Performance Assessment of CT) dosimetry calculator and the CT dose index (CTDI) and was compared with the average glandular dose for two-view screening mammography.
RESULTS. During the study period, 1,325 CT pulmonary angiograms were obtained. Sixty percent (797) of the scans were obtained on female patients. The mean age of scanned females was 52.5 years (range, 1593 years). Of the studies performed in females, 401 (50.31%) were negative, 151 (18.95%) were nondiagnostic, and 245 (30.74%) were positive for pulmonary thromboembolism. The calculated effective minimum dose to the breast of an average 60-kg woman during CT was 2.0 rad (20 mGy) per breast compared with an average glandular dose of 0.300 rad (3 mGy) for standard two-view screening mammography.
CONCLUSION. CT pulmonary angiography delivers a minimum radiation
dose of 2.0 rad (20 mGy) to the breasts of an average-sized woman. This
greatly exceeds the American College of Radiology recommendation of
0.300
rad (3 mGy) or less for standard two-view mammography. The potential latent
carcinogenic effects of such radiation exposure at this time remain unknown.
We encourage the judicious use of CT pulmonary angiography and lower doses and
nonionizing radiation alternatives when appropriate.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Costantino, G. Randall, M. Gosselin, M. Brandt, K. Spinning, and C. D. Vegas CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolus Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 471 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S K DOSHI, I S NEGUS, and J M ODUKO Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2008; 81(968): 653 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Freeman Don't Bury the V/Q Scan: It's as Good as Multidetector CT Angiograms with a Lot Less Radiation Exposure J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 5 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Glassroth Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Too Much of a Good Thing? JAMA, December 19, 2007; 298(23): 2788 - 2789. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Strashun A Reduced Role of V/Q Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1405 - 1407. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gottschalk, P. D. Stein, H. D. Sostman, F. Matta, and A. Beemath Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED II J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1411 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Scarsbrook, K. Bradley, F. Gleeson, A. M. Groves, S. J. Yates, T. Win, I. Kayani, J. Bomanji, and P. J. Ell Perfusion Scintigraphy Still has Important Role in Evaluation of Majority of Pregnant Patients with Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 623 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Harris, D. Bailey, S. Miles, E. Bailey, K. Rogers, P. Roach, P. Thomas, M. Hensley, and G. G. King Objective Analysis of Tomographic Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2007; 175(11): 1173 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Samei, R. S. Saunders Jr, J. A. Baker, and D. M. Delong Digital Mammography: Effects of Reduced Radiation Dose on Diagnostic Performance Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 396 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Scarsbrook and F. V. Gleeson Investigating suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy BMJ, February 24, 2007; 334(7590): 418 - 419. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Stein, P. K. Woodard, J. G. Weg, T. W. Wakefield, V. F. Tapson, H. D. Sostman, T. A. Sos, D. A. Quinn, K. V. Leeper Jr, R. D. Hull, et al. Diagnostic Pathways in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 15 - 21. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. C. Milne Female breast radiation exposure. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): E24 - E24. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Matthews Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol? Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 441 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |