AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sethi, N. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sethi, N. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.0770
AJR 2005; 185:1228-1233
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography

Mark S. Parker1, Ferdinand K. Hui, Marc A. Camacho, Jiyearn K. Chung, Dean W. Broga and Narinder N. Sethi

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Thoracic Imaging, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1250 E Marshall St., Main Bldg., 3rd Fl., PO Box 980615, Richmond, VA 23298-0615.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to estimate the effective radiation dose to the female breast during CT pulmonary angiography compared with other routine diagnostic imaging techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the demographic data of patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography between May 2000 and December 2002, the diagnostic yield of those studies, and the estimated effective radiation dose to the breast incurred during CT. The estimated effective radiation dose was calculated using the ImPACT CT (Impact Performance Assessment of CT) dosimetry calculator and the CT dose index (CTDI) and was compared with the average glandular dose for two-view screening mammography.

RESULTS. During the study period, 1,325 CT pulmonary angiograms were obtained. Sixty percent (797) of the scans were obtained on female patients. The mean age of scanned females was 52.5 years (range, 15–93 years). Of the studies performed in females, 401 (50.31%) were negative, 151 (18.95%) were nondiagnostic, and 245 (30.74%) were positive for pulmonary thromboembolism. The calculated effective minimum dose to the breast of an average 60-kg woman during CT was 2.0 rad (20 mGy) per breast compared with an average glandular dose of 0.300 rad (3 mGy) for standard two-view screening mammography.

CONCLUSION. CT pulmonary angiography delivers a minimum radiation dose of 2.0 rad (20 mGy) to the breasts of an average-sized woman. This greatly exceeds the American College of Radiology recommendation of ≤ 0.300 rad (3 mGy) or less for standard two-view mammography. The potential latent carcinogenic effects of such radiation exposure at this time remain unknown. We encourage the judicious use of CT pulmonary angiography and lower doses and nonionizing radiation alternatives when appropriate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. M. Costantino, G. Randall, M. Gosselin, M. Brandt, K. Spinning, and C. D. Vegas
CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolus
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 471 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S K DOSHI, I S NEGUS, and J M ODUKO
Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2008; 81(968): 653 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. M. Freeman
Don't Bury the V/Q Scan: It's as Good as Multidetector CT Angiograms with a Lot Less Radiation Exposure
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 5 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Glassroth
Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Too Much of a Good Thing?
JAMA, December 19, 2007; 298(23): 2788 - 2789.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman
Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa
Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. M. Strashun
A Reduced Role of V/Q Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1405 - 1407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Gottschalk, P. D. Stein, H. D. Sostman, F. Matta, and A. Beemath
Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED II
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1411 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Scarsbrook, K. Bradley, F. Gleeson, A. M. Groves, S. J. Yates, T. Win, I. Kayani, J. Bomanji, and P. J. Ell
Perfusion Scintigraphy Still has Important Role in Evaluation of Majority of Pregnant Patients with Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 623 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. Harris, D. Bailey, S. Miles, E. Bailey, K. Rogers, P. Roach, P. Thomas, M. Hensley, and G. G. King
Objective Analysis of Tomographic Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2007; 175(11): 1173 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Samei, R. S. Saunders Jr, J. A. Baker, and D. M. Delong
Digital Mammography: Effects of Reduced Radiation Dose on Diagnostic Performance
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 396 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. F. Scarsbrook and F. V. Gleeson
Investigating suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy
BMJ, February 24, 2007; 334(7590): 418 - 419.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. D. Stein, P. K. Woodard, J. G. Weg, T. W. Wakefield, V. F. Tapson, H. D. Sostman, T. A. Sos, D. A. Quinn, K. V. Leeper Jr, R. D. Hull, et al.
Diagnostic Pathways in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 15 - 21.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. N. C. Milne
Female breast radiation exposure.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): E24 - E24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Matthews
Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol?
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 441 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.