AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedrosa, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedrosa, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1323
AJR 2005; 185:1632-1640
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Is True FISP Imaging Reliable in the Evaluation of Venous Thrombosis?

Ivan Pedrosa1, Martina Morrin1, Laura Oleaga2, Jovanna Baptista3 and Neil M. Rofsky1

1 Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Rd., Boston, MA 02215.
2 Department of Radiology, Hospital de Basurto, Bilbao 48013, Spain.
3 Averion Inc., 4 California Ave., Framingham, MA 01701.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis using gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo images and correlative imaging as the gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five MR examinations were retrospectively reviewed independently by two radiologists to rule out thrombosis in the central veins of the body. The presence of venous thrombus was assessed separately in 80 veins using true FISP and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. Diagnosis was confirmed by another imaging technique (sonography, CT, and/or conventional venography) in all positive cases. Negative examinations were confirmed using imaging, clinical follow-up, or both.

RESULTS. Venous thrombosis was present in 25 veins in 18 patients. True FISP images had a lower sensitivity (66%) and specificity (70.9%) for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis than gadolinium-enhanced MR images (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION. True FISP images have lower sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis than gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo images. True FISP images should not be used exclusively for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. J. Lisanti and D. B. Douglas
Effects of Breath-Hold and Cardiac Cycle on the MRI Appearance of the Aorta and Inferior Vena Cava in T2 Abdominal Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1348 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Kandpal, R. Sharma, S. Gamangatti, D. N. Srivastava, and S. Vashisht
Imaging the Inferior Vena Cava: A Road Less Traveled
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 669 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.