AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shi, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1078
AJR 2005; 185:S205-S210
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Radiological Reasoning: Male Breast Mass with Calcifications

Ann A. Shi1, Dianne Georgian-Smith1, Lynn D. Cornell2, Elizabeth A. Rafferty1, Mary Staffa1, Kevin Hughes3 and Daniel B. Kopans1

1 AVON Breast Comprehensive Center and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC 219R, 15 Parkman St., Boston, MA 02114.
2 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
3 Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Objective

We encountered a mammographically calcified breast mass in a 30-year-old man. It was initially thought to be comedo-type ductal carcinoma in situ because of the dense calcifications, but sonography and MRI suggested a highly vascular lesion. The final pathologic diagnosis was hemangioma.

Conclusion

Vascular tumors of the breast occur infrequently and are even more rare in males. The clinical and radiologic diagnosis of breast hemangioma is often difficult, but different imaging techniques, when used together, can provide important information for differential diagnosis and management. A biopsy is required.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
T. G. ODLE
Breast MR
Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2006; 78(1): 45M - 66M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. A. Shi, D. Georgian-Smith, and F. S. Chew
Imaging of the Male Breast: Self-Assessment Module
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6_Supplement): S211 - S213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.