AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilt, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilt, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0215
AJR 2006; 186:48-51
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Perspective

Computer-Aided Detection as Evidence in the Courtroom: Potential Implications of an Appellate Court's Ruling

R. James Brenner1, Michael J. Ulissey2 and Ronald M. Wilt3

1 Department of Radiology-Breast Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, P.O. Box 1667, San Francisco, CA 94143-1667.
2 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.
3 Buckingham, Doolittle, and Burroughs, LLP, Cleveland, OH 44114.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The use of computer-aided detection (CAD) in radiology has been studied for different organ systems. As with any new technology, its impact on determinations of standards of clinical practice is an evolving one that is often defined by its acceptability not only in medical forums but also as defined by courts of law.

CONCLUSION. We discuss the first known appellate legal decision regarding the acceptability of CAD as it relates to the clinical practice of mammography.

Keywords: breast • mammography • radiology practice


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Dick III, T. H. Gallagher, R. J. Brenner, J. P. Yi, L. M. Reisch, L. Abraham, D. L. Miglioretti, P. A. Carney, G. R. Cutter, and J. G. Elmore
Predictors of Radiologists' Perceived Risk of Malpractice Lawsuits in Breast Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 327 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. G. Elmore and R. J. Brenner
The More Eyes, the Better to See? From Double to Quadruple Reading of Screening Mammograms
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1141 - 1143.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
B. F. Branstetter IV
Basics of Imaging Informatics: Part 1
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 656 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
J. J. Fenton, S. H. Taplin, P. A. Carney, L. Abraham, E. A. Sickles, C. D'Orsi, E. A. Berns, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, W. E. Barlow, et al.
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2007; 356(14): 1399 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. S. Greenberg
An Appellate Court Ruling and Potential Implications for CAD Technology in the Courtroom
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 52 - 53.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.