AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Utsunomiya, D.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Utsunomiya, D.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1459
AJR 2006; 186:374-378
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

16-MDCT Aortography with a Low-Dose Contrast Material Protocol

Daisuke Utsunomiya1,2, Kazuo Awai3, Yoshitaka Tamura2, Taiji Nishiharu1, Joji Urata1, Takashi Sakamoto1, Akira Taniguchi4 and Yasuyuki Yamashita2

1 Diagnostic Imaging Center, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, 5-3-1 Chikami, Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto 861-4193, Japan.
2 Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan.
3 Diagnostic Image Analysis, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan.
4 CT Systems Division, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo 113-8456, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate whether a low-dose contrast material (CM) protocol with a saline flush might provide sufficient contrast enhancement in aortoiliac 16-MDCT angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-five patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the CM (300 mg I/mL) administration protocol: group 1 (23 patients) received 100 mL of CM at 3.0 mL/sec; and group 2 (22 patients), 50 mL of CM at 3.0 mL/sec followed by a 20-mL saline flush at 3.0 mL/sec. All patients underwent 16-MDCT angiography of the entire aortoiliac region. Seven regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn from the ascending aorta (ROI 1) to the external iliac artery (ROI 7). Quantitative analysis was performed by calculating the mean aortoiliac attenuation and the mean difference between the maximum and minimum attenuation values. Vascular enhancement of the renal arteries was visually assessed using 2D and 3D postprocessing techniques.

RESULTS. The mean aortoiliac attenuation in group 1 was 314.3 ± 45.9 H and that in group 2 was 306.1 ± 35.0 H. The difference was not statistically significant. Adequate mean aortoiliac attenuation was achieved in 95.7% (22/23) and 95.5% (21/22) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. The mean difference between the maximum and minimum attenuation values was significantly smaller in group 1 (41.3 ± 16.8 H) than in group 2 (57.2 ± 25.3 H). The renal arteries were assessable in all patients in both groups.

CONCLUSION. This protocol of 50 mL of CM with a saline flush provides attenuation comparable to that obtained with the 100 mL of CM in aortoiliac 16-MDCT angiography.

Keywords: aneurysm • aorta • aortography • contrast media • MDCT angiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, S. Oda, Y. Funama, K. T. Bae, and Y. Yamashita
Effect of Contrast Injection Protocols with Dose Adjusted to the Estimated Lean Patient Body Weight on Aortic Enhancement at CT Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 1071 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. T. Bae, A. J. Shah, S. S. Shang, J. H. Wang, S. Chang, M. Kanematsu, and C. F. Hildebolt
Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement with Abdominal 64-MDCT in Pediatric Patients: Effect of Body Weight and Iodine Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1589 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.-Y. Yang, Y.-F. Chen, C.-W. Lee, A. Huang, Y. Shen, C. Wei, and H.-M. Liu
Multiphase CT Angiography versus Single-Phase CT Angiography: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1288 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Nakayama, K. Awai, Y. Funama, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, and Y. Yamashita
Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W490 - W497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.