AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sung, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sung, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1895
AJR 2006; 186:483-490
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Solid Extratesticular Masses in Children: Radiographic and Pathologic Correlation

Tammy Sung1, Wolfram F. J. Riedlinger2, David A. Diamond3 and Jeanne S. Chow4

1 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.
2 Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115.
3 Department of Urology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115.
4 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to review the sonographic and pathologic appearances of the most common solid and complex extratesticular masses in children.

CONCLUSION. Solid or complex extratesticular masses, especially those that are rapidly growing and are painless, raise concerns regarding malignant rhabdomyosarcoma. Mimickers of rhabdomyosarcoma include inflammatory processes such as pseudotumor, chronic epididymitis, or meconium periorchitis. Because sonography cannot distinguish benign from malignant, worrisome extratesticular masses should be biopsied or removed.

Keywords: genitourinary tract imaging • pediatric imaging • scrotal disease • sonography • testicular mass


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
V. Garriga, A. Serrano, A. Marin, S. Medrano, N. Roson, and X. Pruna
US of the Tunica Vaginalis Testis: Anatomic Relationships and Pathologic Conditions
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2009; 29(7): 2017 - 2032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. Stengel and E. M. Remer
Sonography of the Scrotum: Self-Assessment Module
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6_Supplement): S42 - S45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.