AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, M.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, M.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1362
AJR 2006; 186:491-498
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Clinical Significance of Poor CT Enhancement of the Thickened Small-Bowel Wall in Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain

Chung Kuao Chou1,2, Reng Hong Wu1, Chee-Wai Mak1 and Ming-Pin Lin1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, 901 Chung Hwa Rd., Tainan 71010, Taiwan, Republic of China.
2 Department of Radiological Technology, Central Taiwan University of Science of Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China.

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with acute abdominal pain and inner-layer enhancement of a thickened small-bowel wall, as shown on CT, with outcomes in similar patients without such enhancement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively studied outcomes in 126 patients with acute abdominal pain and small-bowel wall thickening on CT: 84 with inner-layer enhancement and 42 without this enhancement. We compared the surgical, small-bowel resection, small-bowel necrosis, and mortality rates between the two groups using the chi-square test.

RESULTS. Among the 42 patients without inner-layer enhancement, 32 (76%) underwent an operation, 27 (64%) received segmental small-bowel resection, 26 (62%) had small-bowel necrosis, and seven (17%) died. All of these proportions were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the corresponding rates—34 (40%), nine (11%), five (6%), and two (2%), respectively—in the 84 patients with inner-layer enhancement. All 31 patients with necrotic small bowel had pathologic evidence of ischemic necrosis involving the mucosa.

CONCLUSION. Among patients with acute abdominal pain, those whose CT scans did not show inner-layer enhancement of a thickened small-bowel wall were more prone to undergo surgery and small-bowel resection and were more likely to have small-bowel necrosis than those with such enhancement. Poor inner-layer enhancement on CT might be consistent with sloughed or necrotic mucosa, as observed on pathology.

Keywords: abdomen • CT • ischemia • small bowel


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Macari, A. J. Megibow, and E. J. Balthazar
A Pattern Approach to the Abnormal Small Bowel: Observations at MDCT and CT Enterography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1344 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.