AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wysowski, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nourjah, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wysowski, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nourjah, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1790
AJR 2006; 186:613-615
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Deaths Attributed to X-Ray Contrast Media on U.S. Death Certificates

Diane K. Wysowski1 and Parivash Nourjah1

1 Both authors: Division of Drug Risk Evaluation, Food and Drug Administration, HFD-433, White Oak, Building 22, Room 3424, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993.

OBJECTIVE. The objectives of our study were to determine the number, rate, and types of deaths attributed to specific X-ray contrast media on the basis of U.S. death certificates and to attempt to assess the comparative safety of commonly used diagnostic X-ray contrast agents using death certificate information.

CONCLUSION. From 1999 through 2001, deaths attributed to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for contrast media occurred at the rate of 1.1–1.2 per million contrast media packages distributed. An analysis of 1999 death certificates indicated that most deaths attributed to contrast media predictably were associated with renal failure or nephropathy and anaphylaxis or allergic reactions. Risk assessment of the comparative safety of classes or agents was limited by lack of specific contrast media names. Names of administered contrast agents should be recorded in patients' medical records and communicated to primary care physicians and certifiers of death in the event of serious sequelae after an identified recent radiologic procedure.

Keywords: anaphylaxis • contrast media • death certificate • drug reactions • imaging report • mortality • renal failure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Sendeski, A. Patzak, T. L. Pallone, C. Cao, A. E. Persson, and P. B. Persson
Iodixanol, Constriction of Medullary Descending Vasa Recta, and Risk for Contrast Medium-induced Nephropathy
Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 697 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. A. Halvorsen
Which Study When? Iodinated Contrast-enhanced CT Versus Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 9 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. Seeliger, B. Flemming, T. Wronski, M. Ladwig, K. Arakelyan, M. Godes, M. Mockel, and P. B. Persson
Viscosity of Contrast Media Perturbs Renal Hemodynamics
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 2912 - 2920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.