AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huber, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huber, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.0746
AJR 2006; 186:627-633
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Single-Shot Inversion Recovery TrueFISP for Assessment of Myocardial Infarction

Armin Huber1, Stefan O. Schoenberg1, Benedikt Spannagl1, Johannes Rieber2, Isabelle Erhard2, Volker Klauss2 and Maximilian F. Reiser1

1 Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich 81377, Germany.
2 Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of imaging the myocardium with a fast multislice inversion recovery 2D single-shot true fast imaging with steady-state precession (trueFISP) sequence during a single breath-hold in comparison with an established segmented inversion recovery turbo fast low-angle shot (turboFLASH) sequence.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-three patients with myocardial infarction were examined on a 1.5-T MR system 10 min after administration of contrast material (gadodiamide, 0.2 mmol/kg) with a single-shot 2D multislice technique (single-shot inversion recovery trueFISP) that allows one to image the entire short axis during one breath-hold (18 heartbeats) and with a segmented 2D single-slice technique (inversion recovery turboFLASH) that requires one breath-hold per slice (12 heartbeats). Signal intensity was determined in normal myocardium, in infarcted myocardium, and in the left ventricle. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of normal and infarcted myocardium was determined. The areas of hyperintense infarctions on selected slices and the entire volumes were compared for both sequence techniques.

RESULTS. The inversion recovery trueFISP sequence has a lower CNR than the inversion recovery turboFLASH sequence (mean values, 10.0 vs 12.9, respectively; p = 0.005) for differentiation of viable from nonviable myocardium. The CNR of injured myocardium and blood in the left ventricular cavity also has a lower value for the multislice technique compared with the single-slice technique (0.6 vs 1.2, respectively; p = 0.045). Assessment of the area of infarction within one slice (r = 0.97, p < 0.002) and of the volume of the entire infarction (r = 0.96, p < 0.003) is possible with excellent correlation of both techniques.

CONCLUSION. Despite having a lower CNR, the inversion recovery 2D single-shot trueFISP sequence allows fast and accurate identification of the area and volume of infarction with high spatial resolution within a single breath-hold.

Keywords: ischemia • heart • MR contrast agents • MRI • myocardial infarction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. U. Bauner, O. Muehling, D. Theisen, C. Hayes, B. J. Wintersperger, M. F. Reiser, and A. M. Huber
Assessment of Myocardial Viability with 3D MRI at 3 T
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1645 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. C. M. van den Bosch, J. J. M. Westenberg, J. C. Post, G. Yo, J. Verwoerd, L. J. M. Kroft, and A. de Roos
Free-Breathing MRI for the Assessment of Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Validation
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): W277 - W281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. Saremi, J. D. Grizzard, and R. J. Kim
Optimizing Cardiac MR Imaging: Practical Remedies for Artifacts
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1161 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.