AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, B.
Right arrow Articles by Opelka, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siewert, B.
Right arrow Articles by Opelka, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1708
AJR 2006; 186:680-686
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Impact of CT-Guided Drainage in the Treatment of Diverticular Abscesses: Size Matters

Bettina Siewert1, Grace Tye1, Jonathan Kruskal1, Jacob Sosna1 and Frank Opelka2

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02115.
2 Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine whether abscess size can be used as a discriminating factor to guide management of patients with diverticular abscesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a word search of our CT database between July 2001 and July 2002 for the CT diagnosis of diverticulitis. CTs were retrospectively reviewed as consensus opinion of two reviewers. CTs were evaluated for presence of an abscess, its location, maximum diameter, and feasibility of percutaneous abscess drainage. Abscesses were categorized into smaller than 3 cm and larger than or equal to 3 cm, and the management of these groups was compared.

RESULTS. Thirty-one abscesses were noted in 30 (17%) of 181 patients with a CT diagnosis of diverticulitis. Twenty-two (73%) of 30 patients had 23 abscesses, all of which were smaller than 3 cm and were treated and resolved with antibiotics alone (p < 0.001). Eight (36%) of 22 required surgical treatment. Eight (26%) of 31 abscesses had a maximum diameter larger than or equal to 3 cm. Four (50%) of eight patients with abscesses 3.4-4.1 cm were treated with antibiotics alone. Four (50%) of eight abscesses, all larger than 4.1 cm, were treated with CT-guided drainage and one abscess required repeat drainage. After resolution of symptoms, surgery was performed in five (62.5%) of eight of the larger abscesses.

CONCLUSION. Patients with abscesses smaller than 3 cm in size can be treated with antibiotics alone and, in some cases, as outpatients, and may not uniformly require surgery. This is also likely true for patients with abscesses 3-4 cm in size, although our results in this group were limited by a small sample size. Patients with abscesses larger than or equal to 4 cm can be managed with CT-guided abscess drainage followed by referral for surgical treatment.

Keywords: abdomen • colon • CT • gastrointestinal radiology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. O. Jacobs
Diverticulitis
N. Engl. J. Med., November 15, 2007; 357(20): 2057 - 2066.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.