AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tachibana, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tachibana, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.0775
AJR 2006; 186:729-742
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Conventional MRI Capabilities in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Transition Zone

Hong Li1, Kazuro Sugimura1, Yasushi Kaji1, Yuri Kitamura1, Masahiko Fujii1, Isao Hara2 and Mayumi Tachibana3

1 Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan 650-0017.
2 Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
3 Division of Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

OBJECTIVES. Our objectives were to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of conventional MRI for the accurate detection of prostate cancer within the transition zone and to compare the results with histopathologic examination results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred sixteen prostate specimens with prostate cancer were consecutively obtained. Axial, sagittal, and coronal T2- and T1-weighted MR images with gadopentetate dimeglumine were independently reviewed by two radiologists. The diagnostic base criteria of the MR images were determined for detecting transition zone cancer as follows: lesions with A, uniform low intensity on T2-weighted images; B, homogeneous gadolinium enhancement; and C, irregular margins both on gadolinium-enhanced and T2-weighted images. Wilcoxon's rank sum and chi-square tests and receiver operating characteristic curves were used. Differences of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS. Eighty-six lesions in the transition zone were analyzed. Histopathologic analysis showed 53 cancers and 33 benign lesions. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for cancer were 50%, 51%, and 51%, respectively with criteria A; 68%, 75%, and 71% with criteria B; and 60%, 72%, and 65% with criteria C. When base criteria were combined into criteria A-B, A-C, and B-C and then further divided into three subgroups, accuracy was found to be highest when the lesion satisfied any two criteria from A, B, and C than those of base criteria, combination criteria, and the other two subgroups.

CONCLUSION. The addition of gadolinium-enhanced MRI to T2-weighted imaging provides better accuracy for detecting cancerous transition zone lesions than the use of T2-weighted imaging alone.

Keywords: cancer • MRI • prostate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. C. Weinreb, J. D. Blume, F. V. Coakley, T. M. Wheeler, J. B. Cormack, C. K. Sotto, H. Cho, A. Kawashima, C. M. Tempany-Afdhal, K. J. Macura, et al.
Prostate Cancer: Sextant Localization at MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging before Prostatectomy--Results of ACRIN Prospective Multi-institutional Clinicopathologic Study
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 122 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. Ocak, M. Bernardo, G. Metzger, T. Barrett, P. Pinto, P. S. Albert, and P. L. Choyke
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer at 3 T: A Study of Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): W192 - W201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, J. J. Futterer, T. Hambrock, S. Takahashi, T. W. J. Scheenen, H. J. Huisman, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, B. C. Knipscheer, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, J. A. Witjes, et al.
Prostate Cancer: Body-Array versus Endorectal Coil MR Imaging at 3 T--Comparison of Image Quality, Localization, and Staging Performance
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 184 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.