|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Radiology and Cancer Biology, Nagasaki University School of
Dentistry, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan. Address correspondence to
T. Nakamura
2 Philips Medical Systems, Toyko, Japan.
OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the diagnostic criteria of high-resolution MRI in differentiating benign and malignant cervical nodes that were palpable and superficial in the neck.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed MR microimaging on 24 histologically proven metastatic nodes, 14 histologically proven lymphomas, and 35 histologically or clinically proven benign nodes in the necks of 26 patients. The lymph nodes were imaged with T1-weighted spin-echo, fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, and spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo-planar sequences using a 47-mm microscopy coil.
RESULTS. MR microimaging provided high-resolution images of the nodes. Hilar fat was lost in 92%, 79%, and 46% of the metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. Smooth nodal margins were lost in 58%, 23%, and 9% of metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. Heterogeneous nodal parenchyma on T1- or fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, or both, was observed in 88%, 29%, and 23% of metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. The apparent diffusion coefficients were significantly different among these three node groups (p < 0.001), with metastatic nodes being the highest, followed by benign nodes. Logistic regression analyses showed that heterogeneous nodal parenchyma and apparent diffusion coefficient levels were significant in discriminating metastatic nodes, and apparent diffusion coefficient levels in discriminating lymphomas. Combined use of these MR microscopic criteria on nodal architecture and apparent diffusion coefficients yielded 90% accuracy (86% sensitivity, 94% specificity) and 93% accuracy (85% sensitivity, 95% specificity) for discriminating metastatic nodes and lymphomas, respectively.
CONCLUSION. The nodal architecture and apparent diffusion coefficient levels on MR microimaging may provide useful information in diagnosing benign and malignant nodes in the neck.
Keywords: cancer head and neck imaging lymph nodes MR microimaging
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Whittaker, A. Coady, L. Culver, G. Rustin, M. Padwick, and A. R. Padhani Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Female Pelvic Tumors: A Pictorial Review RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 759 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vandecaveye, F. De Keyzer, V. Vander Poorten, P. Dirix, E. Verbeken, S. Nuyts, and R. Hermans Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Value of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Nodal Staging Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 134 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tanitame, K. Sasaki, T. Sone, S. Uyama, M. Sumida, T. Ichiki, and K. Ito Anterior Chamber Configuration in Patients with Glaucoma: MR Gonioscopy Evaluation with Half-Fourier Single-Shot RARE Sequence and Microscopy Coil Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 294 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimura, M. Sumi, N. Sakihama, F. Tanaka, H. Takahashi, and T. Nakamura MR Imaging Criteria for the Prediction of Extranodal Spread of Metastatic Cancer in the Neck AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1355 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawai, M. Sumi, and T. Nakamura Turbo Short {tau} Inversion Recovery Imaging for Metastatic Node Screening in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1283 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |