AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sumi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sumi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1832
AJR 2006; 186:749-757
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

MR Microimaging of Benign and Malignant Nodes in the Neck

Misa Sumi1, Marc Van Cauteren2 and Takashi Nakamura1

1 Department of Radiology and Cancer Biology, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan. Address correspondence to T. Nakamura
2 Philips Medical Systems, Toyko, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the diagnostic criteria of high-resolution MRI in differentiating benign and malignant cervical nodes that were palpable and superficial in the neck.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We performed MR microimaging on 24 histologically proven metastatic nodes, 14 histologically proven lymphomas, and 35 histologically or clinically proven benign nodes in the necks of 26 patients. The lymph nodes were imaged with T1-weighted spin-echo, fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, and spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo-planar sequences using a 47-mm microscopy coil.

RESULTS. MR microimaging provided high-resolution images of the nodes. Hilar fat was lost in 92%, 79%, and 46% of the metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. Smooth nodal margins were lost in 58%, 23%, and 9% of metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. Heterogeneous nodal parenchyma on T1- or fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, or both, was observed in 88%, 29%, and 23% of metastatic nodes, lymphomas, and benign nodes, respectively. The apparent diffusion coefficients were significantly different among these three node groups (p < 0.001), with metastatic nodes being the highest, followed by benign nodes. Logistic regression analyses showed that heterogeneous nodal parenchyma and apparent diffusion coefficient levels were significant in discriminating metastatic nodes, and apparent diffusion coefficient levels in discriminating lymphomas. Combined use of these MR microscopic criteria on nodal architecture and apparent diffusion coefficients yielded 90% accuracy (86% sensitivity, 94% specificity) and 93% accuracy (85% sensitivity, 95% specificity) for discriminating metastatic nodes and lymphomas, respectively.

CONCLUSION. The nodal architecture and apparent diffusion coefficient levels on MR microimaging may provide useful information in diagnosing benign and malignant nodes in the neck.

Keywords: cancer • head and neck imaging • lymph nodes • MR microimaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. S. Whittaker, A. Coady, L. Culver, G. Rustin, M. Padwick, and A. R. Padhani
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Female Pelvic Tumors: A Pictorial Review
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 759 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Vandecaveye, F. De Keyzer, V. Vander Poorten, P. Dirix, E. Verbeken, S. Nuyts, and R. Hermans
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Value of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Nodal Staging
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 134 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Tanitame, K. Sasaki, T. Sone, S. Uyama, M. Sumida, T. Ichiki, and K. Ito
Anterior Chamber Configuration in Patients with Glaucoma: MR Gonioscopy Evaluation with Half-Fourier Single-Shot RARE Sequence and Microscopy Coil
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 294 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Kimura, M. Sumi, N. Sakihama, F. Tanaka, H. Takahashi, and T. Nakamura
MR Imaging Criteria for the Prediction of Extranodal Spread of Metastatic Cancer in the Neck
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1355 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Kawai, M. Sumi, and T. Nakamura
Turbo Short {tau} Inversion Recovery Imaging for Metastatic Node Screening in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1283 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.