AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Rofsky, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1698
AJR 2006; 186:1051-1058
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Hepatic Metastases: Perilesional Enhancement on Dynamic MRI

Jeong-Sik Yu1,2 and Neil M. Rofsky1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
2 Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea 135-720.

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to determine whether the perilesional parenchymal enhancement of hepatic metastases could be correlated with tumoral enhancement on arterial phase images or tumor size on dynamic MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred thirty-four lesions of hepatic metastases in 44 patients were subjected to a retrospective analysis of the dynamic MR images obtained with 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequences. The thickness of the enhancing rim on arterial phase images was regarded as a summation of the enhancing component of tumor periphery and perilesional enhancement, which were estimated by the tumor size on precontrast T1-weighted images. The presence of wedge-shaped perilesional enhancement was also correlated with the lesion size.

RESULTS. Except for 17 diffusely enhanced lesions, lesion size was comparable between the lesions with (n = 87; 26 ± 19 [SD] mm) and without rim enhancement (n = 30; 27 ± 23 mm) on the arterial phase dynamic MR images (p > 0.05). The degree of peripheral tumoral enhancement showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.389) with the thickness of the circumferential perilesional enhancement (p < 0.001). The mean size of the lesions with wedge-shaped perilesional enhancement (n = 44; 33 ± 20 mm) was larger than that of the other lesions (n = 90; 25 ± 19 mm) (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION. The degree of circumferential perilesional enhancement of hepatic metastases on arterial phase dynamic MR images would be independent of the lesion size but inversely correlated with the degree of peripheral tumoral vascularity. An understanding of these features may help tumor characterization and should prompt hypotheses and studies of microvascular phenomena in tumoral and epitumoral environments.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • dynamic MRI • liver • liver disease • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Jia, C. O'Dell, J. T. Heverhagen, X. Yang, J. Liang, R. V. Jacko, S. Sammet, T. Pellas, P. Cole, and M. V. Knopp
Colorectal Liver Metastases: Contrast Agent Diffusion Coefficient for Quantification of Contrast Enhancement Heterogeneity at MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 901 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
O. Catalano, F. Sandomenico, A. Nunziata, M. M. Raso, P. Vallone, and A. Siani
Transient Hepatic Echogenicity Difference on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Sonographic Sign and Pitfall
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2007; 26(3): 337 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.