| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Radiology, Yale–New Haven Hospital, Yale University School
of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8042.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of
Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein Bldg., 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA
19104.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the dose of ionizing radiation delivered through the use of unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic by determining the incidence of repeated unenhanced CT examinations and the cumulative radiation dose delivered.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. All unenhanced CT examinations for suspected renal colic performed at our institution over a 6-year period were included, and patient age, sex, and multiplicity of examinations were determined. For the adult patient, this protocol prescribes a fixed tube current of 200 mA, 140 kVp, and a nominal slice width of 5 mm. The dose–length product (DLP) was estimated for 15 randomly chosen single-detector CT (SDCT) and MDCT adult flank pain examinations using manufacturer's software. The mean DLPs for SDCT and MDCT were computed and converted to effective doses. Total effective doses were calculated for patients who underwent more than three examinations, and values were compared with established standards.
RESULTS. A total of 5,564 examinations were performed on 4,562 patients. Of these patients, 2,795 (61%) were women (mean age, 45.5 ± 16.2 [SD] years) and 1,731 (38%) were men (mean age, 44.7 ± 16.4 years), with 144 patients (3%) of pediatric age. The mean effective doses for a single study were 6.5 mSv for SDCT and 8.5 mSv for MDCT. A subset of 176 patients (4%) had three or more examinations, with estimated effective doses ranging from 19.5 to 153.7 mSv. All patients with multiple examinations had a known history of nephrolithiasis.
CONCLUSION. Patients with a history of nephrolithiasis and flank pain are at increased risk for serial CT with potentially high cumulative effective doses.
Keywords: CT • genitourinary imaging • kidney • radiation dose • renal colic • urinary tract
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, J. H. Ellis, J. Dillman, M. J. Schipper, and I. R. Francis Medical Decision Making Regarding Computed Tomographic Radiation Dose and Associated Risk: The Patient's Perspective Arch Intern Med, June 8, 2009; 169(11): 1069 - 1071. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. T. Griffey and A. Sodickson Cumulative Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risk Estimates in Emergency Department Patients Undergoing Repeat or Multiple CT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 887 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Sodickson, P. F. Baeyens, K. P. Andriole, L. M. Prevedello, R. D. Nawfel, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani Recurrent CT, Cumulative Radiation Exposure, and Associated Radiation-induced Cancer Risks from CT of Adults Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 175 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. Ciaschini, E. M. Remer, M. E. Baker, M. Lieber, and B. R. Herts Urinary Calculi: Radiation Dose Reduction of 50% and 75% at CT--Effect on Sensitivity Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G BEDETTI, N BOTTO, M G ANDREASSI, C TRAINO, E VANO, and E PICANO Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E J HALL and D J BRENNER Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 362 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Jaffe, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. I. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, L. M. Hurwitz, and R. C. Nelson Early First-Trimester Fetal Radiation Dose Estimation in 16-MDCT Without and With Automated Tube Current Modulation Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. K. Rex, T. F. Imperiale, J. Regula, M. Polkowski, D. S. Glaser, L. F. Butterly, H. Pohl, D. H. Kim, and P. J. Pickhardt CT Colonography versus Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia N. Engl. J. Med., January 3, 2008; 358(1): 88 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Gaca, S. Delaney, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and D. P. Frush Radiation Doses from Small-Bowel Follow-Through and Abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1015 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-A. Poletti, A. Platon, O. T. Rutschmann, F. R. Schmidlin, C. E. Iselin, and C. D. Becker Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose CT Protocol in Patients with Clinically Suspected Renal Colic Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
