AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cortés, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cortés, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0936
AJR 2006; 186:1342-1348
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Role of Sonography in the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Soledad Alvarez1, Enrique Añorbe2, Pilar Alcorta1, Fernando López2, Ignacio Alonso1 and Julia Cortés1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Olaguibel 29, 01004 Vitoria, Alava, Spain.
2 Department of Radiology, Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Olaguibel, 01004 Vitoria, Alava, Spain.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of sonography and sonographically guided biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of metastatic invasion of the axilla in patients with breast carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a MEDLINE search (keywords, "sonography" OR "ultrasound" AND "axillary") and a manual search of the references of relevant studies and reviews of preoperative diagnosis on sonography of possible axillary metastases. The gold standard required was axillary lymph node dissection; we accepted sentinel node biopsy as an alternative gold standard. Considering the sonographic findings and the results of the sonographically guided biopsy, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated using metaanalysis. We also checked the existence of heterogeneity of the summary results.

RESULTS. Sixteen articles were selected. In sonography of axillae without palpable nodes, and using lymph node size as the criterion for positivity, sensitivity varied between 48.8% (95% confidence interval, 39.6–58%) and 87.1% (76.1–94.3%) and specificity, between 55.6% (44.7–66.3%) and 97.3% (86.1–99.9%). When lymph node morphology was used as the criterion for positivity, sensitivity ranged from 26.4% (15.3–40.3%) to 75.9% (56.4–89.7%) and specificity, from 88.4% (82.1–93.1%) to 98.1% (90.1–99.9%). The results are different if axillae with palpable nodes are included. The sonographically guided biopsy shows a sensitivity that varies between 30.6% (22.5–39.6%) and 62.9% (49.7–74.8%) and a specificity of 100% (94.8–100%). Many of the summary results obtained after meta-analysis show a heterogeneity that disappears, on occasion, on excluding the studies that use a double gold standard.

CONCLUSION. Axillary sonography is moderately sensitive and fairly specific in the diagnosis of axillary metastatic involvement. Sonographically guided biopsy of the sonographically suspicious nodes somewhat increases the specificity, which reaches 100%. Negative sonographic results do not exclude axillary lymph node metastases.

Keywords: breast cancer • lymph nodes • metastases • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. G. Bedi, R. Krishnamurthy, S. Krishnamurthy, B. S. Edeiken, H. Le-Petross, B. D. Fornage, R. L. Bassett Jr., and K. K. Hunt
Cortical Morphologic Features of Axillary Lymph Nodes as a Predictor of Metastasis in Breast Cancer: In Vitro Sonographic Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 646 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. A. Buchholz, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Harris, B. A. Pockaj, N. Khouri, N. F. Hylton, M. J. Miller, T. Whelan, L. J. Pierce, L. J. Esserman, et al.
Statement of the Science Concerning Locoregional Treatments After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Institute Conference
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
S. K. Somasundaram, D. W. Chicken, and M. R. S. Keshtgar
Detection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer
Br. Med. Bull., January 3, 2008; (2008) ldm032v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. A. Newman, M. S. Sabel, A. V. Nees, A. Schott, K. M. Diehl, V. M. Cimmino, A. E. Chang, C. Kleer, D. F. Hayes, and L. A. Newman
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Performed After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Accurate in Patients with Documented Node-Positive Breast Cancer at Presentation
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 14(10): 2946 - 2952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.