AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, P. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1920
AJR 2006; 186:1401-1412
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

An Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Masses Using Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Pulse-Inversion Sonography

Stephanie R. Wilson1,2 and Peter N. Burns1,3

1 Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
2 The Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 585 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada.
3 Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto Imaging Research, and Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for liver mass diagnosis using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ninety-six lesions in 92 patients were evaluated with DMP 115 (Definity)-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography, comprising 44 malignancies (29 hepatocellular carcinomas, 12 metastases, two peripheral cholangiocarcinomas, and one hepatic lymphoma) and 52 benign lesions (26 hemangiomas, 20 focal nodular hyperplasias, and six others). All had continuous low-mechanical-index imaging through the arterial and portal venous phase. A three-person blind review evaluated single images at baseline, early and peak arterial phases, and through the extended portal phases with a movie showing arterial phase wash-in. Reviewers assessed lesional vascularity and enhancement blindly but did not make a diagnosis. Combinations of answers were compared with independently determined final diagnoses to develop an algorithm for liver mass diagnosis.

RESULTS. Portal phase enhancement comprises the first step of the algorithm, with positive or sustained enhancement identifying 48 (92%) of 52 benign lesions and negative enhancement or washout present in 41 (93%) of 44 malignancies. Sustained portal phase enhancement with arterial phase peripheral nodularity and centripetal progression predicted 24 (92%) of 26 of the hemangiomas; diffuse arterial phase enhancement greater than the liver identified 19 (95%) of 20 of the focal nodular hyperplasias. With negative portal phase enhancement, arterial phase information was less effective at differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (25 [86%] of 29 cases) from another hepatic malignancy (11 [73%] of 15 cases).

CONCLUSION. A simple diagnostic algorithm for interpretation of microbubble-enhanced sonography provides sensitive and accurate diagnosis of commonly encountered liver masses.

Keywords: contract media • dynamic sonography • liver • oncologic imaging • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Takayama, M. Makuuchi, M. Kojiro, G. Y. Lauwers, R. B. Adams, S. R. Wilson, H.-J. Jang, C. Charnsangavej, and B. Taouli
Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pathology, Imaging, and Therapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 972 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. R. Wilson, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, H. Iijima, N. Kamiyama, and P. N. Burns
Real-Time Temporal Maximum-Intensity-Projection Imaging of Hepatic Lesions with Contrast-Enhanced Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 691 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. K. Kim, H.-J. Jang, P. N. Burns, J. Murphy-Lavallee, and S. R. Wilson
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma: Differentiation with Low-Mechanical-Index Contrast-Enhanced Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 58 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Lanka, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in a Tertiary Clinical Practice
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2007; 26(12): 1703 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Murphy-Lavallee, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Are Metastases Really Hypovascular in the Arterial Phase?: The Perspective Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1545 - 1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Enhancement Patterns of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Contrast-enhanced US: Comparison with Histologic Differentiation
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 898 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. R. Wilson, T. K. Kim, H.-J. Jang, and P. N. Burns
Enhancement Patterns of Focal Liver Masses: Discordance Between Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): W7 - W12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Greenbaum, P. Burns, J. Copel, D. Cosgrove, J. B. Fowlkes, B. Goldberg, R. Mattrey, D. Merton, M. Robbin, and S. Wilson
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Liver Ultrasound Imaging Clinical Trials
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 705 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
O. Catalano, V. Migaleddu, E. Quaia, and G. Caruso
Terminology for Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: A Practical Glossary
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 717 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. Numata, H. Oka, M. Morimoto, K. Sugimori, R. Kunisaki, H. Nihonmatsu, K. Matsuo, Y. Nagano, A. Nozawa, and K. Tanaka
Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases With Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Gray Scale Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 763 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. R. Wilson, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, and P. N. Burns
Diagnosis of Focal Liver Masses on Ultrasonography: Comparison of Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced Scans
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 775 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
O. Catalano, F. Sandomenico, A. Nunziata, M. M. Raso, P. Vallone, and A. Siani
Transient Hepatic Echogenicity Difference on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Sonographic Sign and Pitfall
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2007; 26(3): 337 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. N. Burns and S. R. Wilson
Focal Liver Masses: Enhancement Patterns on Contrast-enhanced Images--Concordance of US Scans with CT Scans and MR Images
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 162 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.