AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mao, X. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mao, X. Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1408
AJR 2006; 186:1423-1430
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Dynamic CT Evaluation of Tumor Vascularity in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Jin Hong Wang1,2, Peng Qiu Min2, Pei Jun Wang1, Wei Xia Cheng2, Xiu Hui Zhang2, Yu Wang1, Xiao Hu Zhao1 and Xin Qing Mao1

1 Department of Radiology, Tong Ji Hospital, Tong Ji University, Xin Cun Rd. 389, Shanghai 200065, China.
2 Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Shanghai, China.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the correlation between the enhancement parameters of dynamic CT; the carcinoma tissue microvessel density (MVD, a hotspot method to provide a histologic assessment of tumor vascularity); and tumor nuclear grade in renal cell carcinomas.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four patients with histologically diagnosed renal cell carcinoma underwent dynamic enhanced CT. Enhancement parameters, slope of the time-density curve, the density difference before and after tissue enhancement ({Delta}H), tissue blood ratio (TBR), and area under the time-density curve (AR), were calculated for all lesions. Pathology slides corresponding to the CT plane were stained using mouse antihuman CD34 monoclonal antibody and H and E. Fuhrman nuclear grade was used. Vascular hot spots of microvessels were recorded. Spearman's rank correlation was performed to determine the strength of the relationship between enhancement parameters, MVD determinations, and tumor nuclear grade.

RESULTS. MVD with CD34 staining revealed uneven distribution of positively stained vascular endothelial cells in renal cell carcinoma lesions. Heterogeneous distribution of contrast enhancement was seen among and within individual tumors. The tumors appeared as uneven patterns on time-density curves of renal cell carcinoma lesions. Enhancement parameters of H (median, 21.0 H; range, 2.2-105.8 H), TBR (median, 39%; range, 10.7-154.7%), AR (median, 1.58 H x sec; range, 0.23-3.67 H x sec), and slope (median, 2.76; range, 0.53-6.76) varied greatly. Renal cell carcinoma tissue MVD significantly correlated with all enhancement parameters of dynamic CT. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.62, 0.54, 0.55, and 0.44, respectively, for {Delta} H, slope, TBR, and AR (p < 0.0 5). All enhancement parameters did not significantly correlate with tumor nuclear grade. They were not predictive of nuclear grade.

CONCLUSION. Enhancement parameters of dynamic CT may be suited to evaluate tumor vascularity in vivo. Dynamic enhanced CT images may reflect the heterogeneity of tumor angiogenesis on the basis of the correlation between enhancement parameters and MVD of renal cell carcinoma.

Keywords: dynamic CT • genitourinary imaging • kidney • renal cell carcinoma • research • tumor vascularity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. Vikram, C. S. Ng, P. Tamboli, N. M. Tannir, E. Jonasch, S. F. Matin, C. G. Wood, and C. M. Sandler
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation and Spectrum of Disease1
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 741 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Goh, S. Halligan, F. Daley, D. M. Wellsted, T. Guenther, and C. I. Bartram
Colorectal Tumor Vascularity: Quantitative Assessment with Multidetector CT--Do Tumor Perfusion Measurements Reflect Angiogenesis?
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 510 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Goh, S. Halligan, A. Gharpuray, D. Wellsted, J. Sundin, and C. I. Bartram
Quantitative Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Tumor Vascular Parameters by Using Perfusion CT: Influence of Tumor Region of Interest
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 726 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Jinzaki and S. Kuribayashi
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT of Renal Cell Carcinoma for Evaluation of Tumor Vascularity: Analysis of Single-Phase or Multiphase Scanning
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W569 - W569.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-h. Wang, P.-j. Wang, and X.-h. Zhao
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W570 - W570.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.