AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cantwell, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Eustace, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cantwell, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Eustace, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.0938
AJR 2006; 186:S244-S248
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Radiofrequency Ablation of Osteoid Osteoma with Cooled Probes and Impedance-Control Energy Delivery

Colin P. Cantwell1, John O'Byrne1,2 and Stephen Eustace1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St., Dublin 7, Ireland.
2 Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11, Ireland.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma with cooled radiofrequency probes and impedance control energy delivery from a 200-W generator. We also compared the outcome to published data for therapy with a 5-mm noncooled probe and temperature-controlled short-duration therapy protocols.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Radiofrequency ablation was performed on 11 patients with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. A cooled radiofrequency probe was introduced into the lesion under CT guidance. Twelve minutes of radiofrequency energy was delivered from a 200-W generator under impedance control. Postprocedural pain, function, and satisfaction were evaluated by means of an interview and questionnaire.

RESULTS. All procedures were technically successful. No serious complication occurred. Postoperative pain was scored at a mean of 6.9 ± 3.06 (95% confidence interval) on a numeric rating scale. Postoperative pain was rated as similar to night pain. By 1 week after therapy, all patients had resolution of pain and returned to normal activity. There was no recurrence during the follow-up period (range, 6-27 months; mean, 14.4 months). Patients rated their satisfaction as high.

CONCLUSION. Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma with a high-energy delivery technique is safe and has a high success rate. When compared with patients in a published series using 5-mm probes and manual energy control from lower-output generators, our cohort showed increased postoperative pain scores and an increased interval to symptom resolution.

Keywords: bone neoplasm • osteoma • radiofrequency ablation • therapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
U. Albisinni, R. Ciminari, C. Malaguti, and E. Rimondi
Radiofrequency Ablation of Osteoid Osteoma with Cooled Probes and Impedance-Control Energy Delivery
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W578 - W578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. P. Cantwell, S. Eustace, and J. O'Byrne
Reply
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W579 - W579.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.