AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schima, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schima, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1226
AJR 2006; 186:1571-1579
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Quadruple-Phase MDCT of the Liver in Patients with Suspected Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Effect of Contrast Material Flow Rate

Wolfgang Schima1, Renate Hammerstingl2, Carlo Catalano3, Luis Marti-Bonmati4, Ernst J. Rummeny5, Francisco Tardáguila Montero6, Albert Dirisamer1, Bernd Westermayer7, Massimo Bellomi8, Denis Brisbois9, Patrick Chevallier10, Martin Dobritz5, Jacques Drouillard11, Francesco Fraioli3, Maria Jesus Martinez4, Sandro Morassut12 and Thomas J. Vogl2

1 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
2 Department of Radiology, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet Frankfurt, Germany.
3 Unita Operativa di Radiologia, Universita La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.
4 Servicio de Radiologia, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
5 Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Muenchen, Germany.
6 Departamento de Radiologia, Centro Medico, Policlinico Vigo, Priegue, Spain.
7 Amersham Buchler GmbH & Co KG, Ismaning, Germany.
8 Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy.
9 Les Cliniques St. Joseph, Liege, Belgium.
10 CHU Hopital de lArchet II, Nice, France.
11 CHU Hopital Haut Leveque, Bordeaux, France.
12 Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of contrast material flow rate (3 mL/sec vs 5 mL/sec) on the detection and visualization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with MDCT and the safety profile of iodixanol at different injection rates.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In a prospective, randomized multicenter trial, 97 patients (83 men and 14 women, with a mean age of 64 years) suspected of having HCC underwent quadruple-phase (double arterial, portal venous, delayed phase) 4-16-MDCT. Patients were randomized to receive iodixanol, 320 mg I/mL (1.5 mL/kg body weight), at a flow rate of 3 mL/sec (48 patients) or 5 mL/sec (49 patients). Qualitative (lesion detection, image quality) and quantitative (liver and aortic enhancement, tumor-liver contrast) analyses and safety assessment were performed.

RESULTS. Overall, 145 HCCs were detected in the 5 mL/sec group and 100 HCCs in the 3 mL/sec group (p < 0.05). More lesions equal to or less than 1 cm were detected at 5 mL/sec (33 vs 16 lesions). The late arterial phase showed significantly more lesions than the early, arterial phase (133 vs 100 and 96 vs 67 lesions, respectively, p < 0.0001). Hyperattenuating HCCs were better visualized in the late arterial phase at 5 mL/sec (excellent visualization: 54% vs 27%). Using a flow of 5 mL/sec did not increase the rate of patient discomfort or contrast media-related adverse events. Most discomfort in both groups was of mild intensity and there was no severe discomfort.

CONCLUSION. For detection of HCC with MDCT, a higher flow rate of 5 mL/sec is recommended. Visualization of hyperattenuating HCC is improved with no greater discomfort or adverse events.

Keywords: CT • MDCT • liver disease • contrast media


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, T. Namimoto, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita
Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.