AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burling, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burling, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0171
AJR 2006; 186:1597-1604
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Polyp Measurement Using CT Colonography: Agreement with Colonoscopy and Effect of Viewing Conditions on Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement

David Burling1, Steve Halligan1,2, Stuart Taylor1,2, Duncan J. Brennand1, Douglas G. Altman3, Paul Bassett4, Wendy Atkin1 and Clive I. Bartram1

1 Intestinal Imaging Centre, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, England HA1 3UJ.
3 Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, England.
4 Consultant, Ruislip, Middlesex, England.

OBJECTIVE. This article presents inter- and intraobserver agreement for estimates of polyp diameter using CT colonography, including the effects of different visualization displays and prior experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four observers, three of whom had prior experience with CT colonography, estimated the maximum diameter of 48 polyps using three different visualization displays: 2D colonography window, 2D abdominal window, and 3D surface rendering. Each re-measured a subset of 10 polyps. Polyps measured 2 to 12 mm according to a colonoscopic reference. Inter- and intraobserver agreement and agreement with the reference measurement were determined using the Bland-Altman method, paired Student's t testing, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and by calculating the components of variance.

RESULTS. CT measurements overestimated polyp diameter, a phenomenon found least using the 2D abdominal display. Generally, 95% limits of agreement encompassed different size categories for individual polyps: the widest spanned 14.6 mm (-4.6 mm to 10.0 mm) for an experienced observer using the 3D display. When using the 2D abdominal display, no significant difference was found between estimates and the reference value for the other two experienced observers (p = 0.83 and 0.23). All the observers' measurements were significantly different from the reference when using the 3D display (p < 0.001). The novice was significantly different from the experienced observers in some analyses. Inter- and intraobserver agreement were poorest for the 3D display.

CONCLUSION. Measurement of polyp diameter from CT colonography is subject to variation contingent on the observer's experience and the viewing display used. Although 3D visualization display is commonly used for polyp detection, it should not be used for measurement.

Keywords: colon • colonoscopy • colorectal cancer • CT colonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. van Wijk, J. Florie, C. Y. Nio, E. Dekker, A. H. de Vries, H. W. Venema, L. J. van Vliet, J. Stoker, and F. M. Vos
Protrusion Method for Automated Estimation of Polyp Size on CT Colonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1279 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Park, E. K. Choi, S. S. Lee, J. Y. Woo, S. Y. Chung, Y. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and H. K. Ha
Linear Polyp Measurement at CT Colonography: 3D Endoluminal Measurement with Optimized Surface-rendering Threshold Value and Automated Measurement
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 157 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Taylor, A. Slater, S. Halligan, L. Honeyfield, M. E. Roddie, J. Demeshski, H. Amin, and D. Burling
CT Colonography: Automated Measurement of Colonic Polyps Compared with Manual Techniques--Human in Vitro Study
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 120 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.