AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Min, Y. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Min, Y. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1889
AJR 2006; 186:1611-1617
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Flat Polyps of the Colon: Detection with 16-MDCT Colonography—Preliminary Results

Seong Ho Park1, Hyun Kwon Ha1, Ah Young Kim1, Kyoung Won Kim1, Moon-Gyu Lee1, Pyo Nyun Kim1, Yong Moon Shin1, Jeong-Sik Byeon2, Suk-Kyun Yang2, Jin Ho Kim2 and Young Il Min2

1 Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-Dong, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, South Korea, 138-040.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. This study evaluates the ability of contrast-enhanced, 16-MDCT colonography to display flat colonic lesions when a very narrow slice thickness (1 mm) is used.

CONCLUSION. Less than 50% of flat lesions in our population could be visualized by blinded and unblinded review. Before they could be visualized, flat lesions were 2 mm or greater in height and 7 mm or greater in diameter. Lesions with a height of 1 mm or less were not seen on CT colonography. Contrast enhancement, location on a haustral fold, and abnormal 2D and 3D morphology contributed to lesion conspicuity.

Keywords: colon • colonography • colonoscopy • CT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Lee, S. H. Park, E. K. Choi, S. Y. Kim, M.-J. Kim, K. H. Lee, and Y. H. Kim
Colorectal Polyps on Portal Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT Colonography: Lesion Attenuation and Distinction from Tagged Feces
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 35 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Park, S. S. Lee, E. K. Choi, S. Y. Kim, S.-K. Yang, J. H. Kim, and H. K. Ha
Flat Colorectal Neoplasms: Definition, Importance, and Visualization on CT Colonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 953 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.