AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nikolaou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nikolaou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, C. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0726
AJR 2006; 186:1659-1668
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Clinical Value of MDCT in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with a Low Pretest Likelihood of Significant Disease

Konstantin Nikolaou1, Carsten Rist1, Bernd J. Wintersperger1, Tobias F. Jakobs1, Roland van Gessel2, Miles A. Kirchin3, Andreas Knez4, Franz von Ziegler4, Maximilian F. Reiser1 and Christoph R. Becker1

1 Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Grosshadern Campus, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich 81377, Germany.
2 Bracco Altana Pharma GmbH, Konstanz, Germany.
3 Worldwide Medical Affairs, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy.
4 Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in a population having a low pretest likelihood of significant disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixty-four patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a low pretest likelihood of significant disease according to the criteria of the American Heart Association underwent both MDCT of the heart and quantitative conventional coronary angiography (QCA). MDCT examinations were performed on a 16-MDCT scanner. CT data sets were evaluated on a per-patient basis and a per-segment basis and were classified as indicating no disease, nonsignificant disease (stenoses ≤ 50%), or significant disease (stenoses > 50%). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 16-MDCT in the detection or exclusion of significant and nonsignificant coronary artery disease were evaluated on both per-patient and per-segment bases.

RESULTS. Regarding the success rate of 16-MDCT, 94% (60/64) of patients and 92% (388/420) of vessel segments were of sufficient quality for diagnosis. In the remaining 60 patients evaluated, QCA revealed significant coronary artery disease, nonsignificant disease, and no disease in 8.3% (5/60), 75.0% (45/60), and 16.7% (10/60) of cases, respectively, on a per-patient basis, and in 1.3% (5/388), 23.2% (90/388), and 75.5% (293/388) of cases, respectively, on a per-segment basis. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of 16-MDCT for the detection of significant coronary artery disease were 80.0%, 94.5%, 98.1%, and 57.1%, respectively, on a per-patient basis, and 80.0%, 99.2%, 99.7%, and 57.1% on a per-segment basis.

CONCLUSION. In a population having a low pretest likelihood of significant coronary artery disease, 16-MDCT shows a moderate to high sensitivity and high NPV for the detection or exclusion of significant disease, but has a somewhat reduced PPV compared with QCA.

Keywords: angiography • atherosclerosis • coronary artery disease • MDCT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Plumhans, G. Muhlenbruch, A. Rapaee, K.-H. Sim, T. Seyfarth, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken
Assessment of Global Right Ventricular Function on 64-MDCT Compared with MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1358 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Hamon, R. Morello, J. W. Riddell, and M. Hamon
Coronary Arteries: Diagnostic Performance of 16- versus 64-Section Spiral CT Compared with Invasive Coronary Angiography Meta-Analysis
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 720 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Andreini, G. Pontone, M. Pepi, G. Ballerini, A. L. Bartorelli, A. Magini, C. Quaglia, E. Nobili, and P. Agostoni
Diagnostic Accuracy of Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2044 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Andreini, G. Pontone, G. Ballerini, E. Bertella, E. Nobili, A. Parolari, and M. Pepi
Bypass Graft and Native Postanastomotic Coronary Artery Patency: Assessment With Computed Tomography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1672 - 1678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Hamon, G. G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, P. Malagutti, P. Agostoni, R. Morello, M. Valgimigli, and M. Hamon
Diagnostic Performance of Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography of Coronary Arteries as Compared With Conventional Invasive Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1896 - 1910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.