AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goh, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goh, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0050
AJR 2006; 187:164-169
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Quantitative Assessment of Tissue Perfusion Using MDCT: Comparison of Colorectal Cancer and Skeletal Muscle Measurement Reproducibility

Vicky Goh1, Steve Halligan2,3, Jo-Ann Hugill2 and Clive I. Bartram2

1 Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mt. Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom.
2 Intestinal Imaging Centre, St. Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.
3 Present address: Specialist Radiology, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to determine the reproducibility of quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurements using dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT, and to compare this with measurements from skeletal muscle.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ten patients (mean age, 67 years; six men, four women) with histologically proven colorectal cancer were examined prospectively using 4-MDCT. Perfusion studies (cine mode; 4 x 5 mm collimation; 1 acquisition/s; 65 seconds total) were performed through the tumor epicenter after IV bolus contrast administration (iopamidol 340, 100 mL; 5 mL/s) and repeated within 48 hours. Quantitative values for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability were determined using commercial software. Two regions of interest were studied on the axial image: one within the tumor and another within the left gluteal muscle. Measurement reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman statistics.

RESULTS. For the tumor, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) was -0.04 mL/100 g tissue (-2.50, 2.42); 8.80 (-50.5, 68.0) mL/100 g tissue/min; -0.99 (-8.19, 6.20) seconds; and 1.20 (-5.42, 7.83) mL/100 g tissue/min for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability, respectively. For muscle, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) was 0.02 (-1.40, 1.43), 6.60 (-11.2, 24.3), -3.76 (-16.87, 9.35), and 1.30 (-4.68, 7.28), respectively.

CONCLUSION. Quantitative perfusion measurements are reproducible. Measurements from tumor are less variable than from skeletal muscle.

Keywords: cancer • colon • colorectal cancer • dynamic CT • MDCT • perfusion CT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Goh, S. Halligan, F. Daley, D. M. Wellsted, T. Guenther, and C. I. Bartram
Colorectal Tumor Vascularity: Quantitative Assessment with Multidetector CT--Do Tumor Perfusion Measurements Reflect Angiogenesis?
Radiology, September 23, 2008; (2008) 2492071365.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Goh, S. Halligan, A. Gharpuray, D. Wellsted, J. Sundin, and C. I. Bartram
Quantitative Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Tumor Vascular Parameters by Using Perfusion CT: Influence of Tumor Region of Interest
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 726 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. L. Buckley, V. Goh, and S. Halligan
Are Measurements from Two Commercial Software Packages Interchangeable? Possibly, If Like Is Compared with Like
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 642 - 643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. C. Faria, C. S. Ng, K. R. Hess, S. Phongkitkarun, J. Szejnfeld, D. Daliani, and C. Charnsangavej
CT Quantification of Effects of Thalidomide in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 378 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Goh, S. Halligan, and C. I. Bartram
Quantitative Tumor Perfusion Assessment with Multidetector CT: Are Measurements from Two Commercial Software Packages Interchangeable?
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 777 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.