| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research |
1 Division of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk
A21, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
2 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
Cleveland, Ohio.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to evaluate a histogram analysis method for distinguishing adrenal adenomas from metastases, pheochromocytomas, and adrenocortical carcinomas on CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. A pathology database was searched, and 335 adrenalectomies from 1995 to 2002 were identified. CT images were available for retrospective review in 187 patients (93 males, 94 females; age range, 15-84 years; mean age, 55.2 years) with 208 adrenal masses. This included 112 adenomas in 104 patients, 48 metastases in 39 patients, 40 pheochromocytomas in 36 patients, and eight adrenocortical carcinomas in eight patients. Histogram analysis was performed using a circular region of interest for mean attenuation, number of pixels, number of negative pixels (< 0 H), and percentage of negative pixels by two interpreters. Areas of necrosis were excluded from measurements. Observer agreement was calculated.
RESULTS. In 72 of 76 (94.7%) and 63 of 72 (87.5%) adenomas, respectively, interpreters found attenuation values greater than 10 H contained negative pixels on unenhanced CT scans. None of the enhanced adenomas had mean attenuation less than or equal to 10 H, but 24 (38.7%) and 28 (45.2%), respectively, had negative pixels. Negative pixels were present in unenhanced and enhanced metastases, pheochromocytomas, and carcinomas. Using a 5% or 10% negative pixel threshold value to diagnose adenoma improved specificity but diminished sensitivity. Specificity for a 10% negative pixel threshold was approximately 88% for unenhanced CT scans and 99% for enhanced CT scans, with sensitivities of 71% and 12%, respectively.
CONCLUSION. Although specificity for the diagnosis of adenomas on enhanced CT scans with histogram analysis was high when a 10% negative pixel threshold was used, low sensitivity likely limits clinical usefulness.
Keywords: abdominal imaging • adrenal adenoma • adrenal carcinoma • adrenal gland • adrenal metastasis • CT imaging • pheochromocytoma
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman Adrenal Imaging with Multidetector CT: Evidence-based Protocol Optimization and Interpretative Practice RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1319 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Ho, E. K. Paulson, M. J. Brady, T. Z. Wong, and S. T. Schindera Lipid-Poor Adenomas on Unenhanced CT: Does Histogram Analysis Increase Sensitivity Compared with a Mean Attenuation Threshold? Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 234 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. A. Catalano, A. E. Samir, D. V. Sahani, and P. F. Hahn Pixel Distribution Analysis: Can It be Used to Distinguish Clear Cell Carcinomas from Angiomyolipomas with Minimal Fat? Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 738 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
