AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0257
AJR 2006; 187:198-206
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Optimal Scan Window for Detection of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas During MDCT Examination

Myeong-Jin Kim1,2,3, Jin Young Choi1,3, Joon Seok Lim3, Jin Yong Kim1,3, Joo Hee Kim3, Young Taik Oh1,3, Eun Hye Yoo1,3, Jae Joon Chung1 and Ki Whang Kim1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-ku Shinchon-dong 134, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
2 Institute of Gastroenterology and Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to define the optimal scan window for acquiring arterial phase images in the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Biphasic arterial phase CT examinations were performed using a 16-MDCT scanner on 198 patients (159 men and 39 women; mean age, 59 years; age range, 25-82 years) with nodular HCC. All examinations were performed after administering 120-150 mL of a nonionic contrast media (370 mg I/mL) at a rate of 3-4 mL/s. The scan delay—the interval between when the bolus-tracking program detected the threshold enhancement of 100 H in the abdominal aorta and the start of the first arterial scan—was progressively lengthened by 2-second intervals, from 10 seconds in group 1 to 20 seconds in group 6. The second arterial phase scan was started 6 seconds after the end of the early scan. A tube collimation of 1.5 mm, a table feed of 18 mm per rotation, an image thickness of 3 mm, and 3-mm increments were used. The duration of each phase scan was 4.5-8.8 seconds. Tumor-to-liver attenuation difference (TLAD) at the first (TLAD1) and second (TLAD2) arterial phase images were compared lesion by lesion. Four observers assigned subjective ratings of visual conspicuity and individual preferences for each phase in each group.

RESULTS. The mean threshold time (100 H) was 18.4 ± 3.1 seconds, and 97% of patients were within the range of 13-24 seconds. The mean TLAD1 of groups 3 to 6 and the mean TLAD2 of groups 1 to 5 were all comparable; they were also all significantly (p < 0.005) higher than the mean TLAD1 of groups 1 and 2 and the mean TLAD2 of group 6. In groups 1 and 2, the mean TLAD2 was significantly higher than the mean TLAD1 (p < 0.001); in groups 5 and 6, the mean TLAD1 was significantly higher than the mean TLAD2 (p < 0.001). In groups 3 and 4, the mean TLAD1 and TLAD2 were similar. The visual conspicuity and individual preferences were higher for the first-phase image in groups 3 to 6 and the second-phase image in groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION. The optimal scan window for arterial phase images in the detection of HCC seems to be approximately 14-30 seconds from the 100-H threshold.

Keywords: abdomen • contrast media • CT technique • hepatocellular carcinoma • liver • MDCT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Ma, A. E. Samir, N.-S. Holalkere, and D. V. Sahani
Optimal Arterial Phase Imaging for Detection of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Determined by Continuous Image Capture on 16-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 772 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, T. Namimoto, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita
Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. L. Chu, B. N. Joe, A. C. A. Westphalen, E. M. Webb, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh
Patient-specific Time to Peak Abdominal Organ Enhancement Varies with Time to Peak Aortic Enhancement at MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 779 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.