AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goshima, S.
Right arrow Articles by Moriyama, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goshima, S.
Right arrow Articles by Moriyama, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1878
AJR 2006; 187:W25-W32
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

MDCT of the Liver and Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Optimizing Scan Delays for Bolus-Tracking Techniques of Hepatic Arterial and Portal Venous Phases

Satoshi Goshima1, Masayuki Kanematsu1, Hiroshi Kondo1, Ryujiro Yokoyama2, Toshiharu Miyoshi2, Hironori Nishibori1, Hiroki Kato1, Hiroaki Hoshi1, Minoru Onozuka3 and Noriyuki Moriyama4

1 Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology Services, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
3 Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Kanagawa Dental College, Yokosuka, Japan.
4 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the optimal scan delays required for hepatic arterial and portal venous phase imaging and for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in contrast-enhanced MDCT of the liver using a bolus-tracking program.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT images (2.5-mm collimation, 5-mm thickness with no intersectional gap) detected an increase in the CT value of 50 H in the lower thoracic aorta. The images were obtained after an IV bolus injection of 2 mL/kg of nonionic iodine contrast material (300 mg I/mL) at 4 mL/s in 171 patients, who were prospectively randomized into three groups with scans commencing at 5, 20, and 45 seconds; 10, 25, and 50 seconds; and 15, 30, and 55 seconds for the first (acquisition time: 4.3 seconds), second (4.3 seconds), and third (9.1 seconds) phases, respectively, after a bolus-tracking program. CT values of the aorta, spleen, proximal portal veins, liver parenchyma, and hepatic veins were measured. Increases in CT values from unenhanced to contrast-enhanced CT were assessed using a contrast enhancement index (CEI). Spleen-to-liver and HCC-to-liver contrasts were also assessed. A qualitative degree of contrast enhancement in each organ was prospectively assessed by two independent radiologists.

RESULTS. At 10-15 seconds, the CEI of the aorta reached 300-336 H and that of the spleen reached 97-108 H without significant enhancement of liver parenchyma (15-25 H). The CEI of the proximal portal veins moderately increased (75-104 H) at 10-15 seconds, but no significant enhancement of hepatic veins was observed (24-51 H). The CEI of liver parenchyma peaked (59-63 H) at 45-55 seconds, when the CEIs of the aorta (117-125 H) and spleen (73-82 H) decreased. Spleen-to-liver contrast (81-84 H) was highest at 10-20 seconds and HCC-to-liver contrast (39-44 H) was highest at 10-15 seconds. The qualitative results correlated well with quantitative results.

CONCLUSION. The optimal scan delays for hepatic arterial and portal venous phases after the bolus-tracking program detected threshold enhancement by 50 H in the lower thoracic aorta for the detection of hypervascular HCCs were 10-15 and 45-55 seconds, respectively.

Keywords: contrast media • CT technique • liver


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. T. Boll and E. M. Merkle
Diffuse Liver Disease: Strategies for Hepatic CT and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2009; 29(6): 1591 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, Y. Tomita, T. Miyoshi, A. Hatcho, N. Moriyama, M. Onozuka, Y. Shiratori, and K. T. Bae
Abdominal Multidetector CT in Patients with Varying Body Fat Percentages: Estimation of Optimal Contrast Material Dose
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 872 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, T. Namimoto, S. Oda, Y. Funama, and Y. Yamashita
Optimal Contrast Dose for Depiction of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Dynamic CT Using 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, H. Kondo, K. T. Bae, K. Awai, and Y. Yamashita
How Should We Optimize Bolus Tracking with Multidetector CT of the Abdomen?
Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 643 - 645.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. L. Chu, B. N. Joe, A. C. A. Westphalen, E. M. Webb, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh
Patient-specific Time to Peak Abdominal Organ Enhancement Varies with Time to Peak Aortic Enhancement at MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 779 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Heilmaier, R. Sutter, A. M. Lutz, B. Seifert, D. Weishaupt, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann
Mapping of Hepatic Vascular Anatomy: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Parallel MR Imaging Compared with 64 Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 872 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.