AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tozaki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tozaki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0881
AJR 2006; 187:313-321
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Breast MRI Using the VIBE Sequence: Clustered Ring Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Lesions Showing Non-Masslike Enhancement

Mitsuhiro Tozaki1,2, Takao Igarashi2 and Kunihiko Fukuda2

1 Present address: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Breast Center, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan 296-8602.
2 Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-8461.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of a finding in which minute ring enhancements are clustered (defined as clustered ring enhancement) in lesions showing non-masslike enhancement and to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this sign, in addition to that of the BI-RADS MRI descriptors, in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed of 61 consecutive lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T system using the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence. The kinetic parameter was visually assessed as follows: washout, plateau, and persistent.

RESULTS. The most frequent morphologic finding among the malignant lesions was heterogeneous internal enhancement (69%) (p = 0.003), followed in frequency by segmental distribution (54%) (p < 0.001); whereas, stippled internal enhancement was the most frequent finding in benign lesions (50%) (p < 0.001). The presence of clustered ring enhancement was found in 63% of the malignant lesions and only 4% of the benign lesions (p < 0.001). The features with the highest positive predictive value for malignancy were a segmental distribution (100%), clustered ring enhancement (96%), and a washout pattern (94%). The specificity of clustered ring enhancement was 96% (25/26). In cases showing focal and regional enhancement, the combination of clumped internal architecture and clustered ring enhancement showed a statistically significant association with malignant lesions (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION. Clustered ring enhancement is thought to be a useful sign to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, in addition to the BI-RADS MRI descriptors.

Keywords: BI-RADS • breast • breast cancer • MRI • VIBE sequence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
D. C. G. SAINSBURY, N. HIDVEGI, and J. W. BLAIR
Intra-tendinous Gout in a Repaired Flexor Digitorum Profundus
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., August 1, 2008; 33(4): 528 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. J. Stern
Seek and You Shall Find
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 265 - 265.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.