HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dodd, J. D. Articles by Müller, N. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dodd, J. D. Articles by Müller, N. L. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Conventional High-Resolution CT Versus Helical High-Resolution MDCT in the Detection of Bronchiectasis

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, 855 W. 12th Ave., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6K 1R4.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare conventional high-resolution CT (HRCT) with helical 16-MDCT in the detection of bronchiectasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients including 61 with bronchiectasis (mean age, 64 years; range, 22-87 years) and a control group of 19 patients with normal MDCT of the chest. Two sets of images were blindly, randomly analyzed by two observers: contiguous 1-mm slices (MDCT set) and 1-mm slices every 10 mm (HRCT set) derived from the MDCT set. Images were scored independently for presence, extent, and severity of bronchiectasis, followed by a consensus interpretation. Kappa analysis assessed inter- and intraobserver agreement. MDCT was the radiologic gold standard.

RESULTS. Of the 61 patients with bronchiectasis diagnosed with MDCT, 56 (92%) were positive for bronchiectasis on conventional HRCT. Seven patients had positive MDCT scans only, and two patients had positive HRCT scans only. Of 479 lobes, 59 were positive for bronchiectasis on MDCT and negative on HRCT, and 19 lobes were positive for bronchiectasis on HRCT and negative on MDCT (p < 0.0001). MDCT showed 25 more lobes with cylindric, 11 more lobes with varicose, and four more lobes with cystic bronchiectasis than did HRCT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of HRCT in detecting bronchiectasis were 71%, 93%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Interobserver agreement for presence, extent, and severity of bronchiectasis ranged from moderate to good for MDCT (kappa values, 0.64, 0.5, and 0.48, respectively) and poor to good for HRCT (kappa values, 0.65, 0.46, and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION. Contiguous helical 16-MDCT with 1-mm collimation is superior to HRCT at 10-mm intervals in showing the presence and extent of bronchiectasis.

Keywords: bronchiectasis • high-resolution CT • lung disease • MDCT

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. E. O'Donnell Bronchiectasis Chest, October 1, 2008; 134(4): 815 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Hansell, A. A. Bankier, H. MacMahon, T. C. McLoud, N. L. Muller, and J. Remy Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 697 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P M Gustafsson, P A De Jong, H A W M Tiddens, and A Lindblad Multiple-breath inert gas washout and spirometry versus structural lung disease in cystic fibrosis Thorax, February 1, 2008; 63(2): 129 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. de Jong and H. A. W. M. Tiddens Cystic Fibrosis Specific Computed Tomography Scoring Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 338 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]