AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Utsunomiya, D.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Utsunomiya, D.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0612
AJR 2006; 187:638-644
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Cardiac 16-MDCT for Anatomic and Functional Analysis: Assessment of a Biphasic Contrast Injection Protocol

Daisuke Utsunomiya1,2, Kazuo Awai2, Takashi Sakamoto1, Taiji Nishiharu1, Joji Urata1, Akira Taniguchi3, Takeshi Nakaura2 and Yasuyuki Yamashita2

1 Diagnostic Imaging Center, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, 5-3-1 Chikami, Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto 861-4193, Japan.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
3 CT Systems Division, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal contrast injection protocol for clear delineation of the endocardial and epicardial contours and coronary vessels in anatomic and functional imaging with cardiac 16-MDCT.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight patients were allocated to three groups according to contrast injection protocol: a long-duration biphasic protocol in which diluted contrast material was used in the latter phase (protocol A, 13 patients); a uniphasic protocol with saline flush (protocol B, 12 patients); a uniphasic protocol without a flush (protocol C, 13 patients). Six regions of interest were drawn within the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and interventricular septum along the z-axis. Mean ventricular attenuation, mean difference between maximum and minimum ventricular attenuation, and ventricular-myocardial contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Attenuation and visualization of the coronary vessels also were compared.

RESULTS. The difference between maximum and minimum RV attenuation was significantly smaller in group A (58.1 H) than in groups B (179.5 H) and C (157.0 H). RV-myocardial CNR was significantly higher in group A (9.0) than in group B (5.5). The mean LV attenuation, difference between maximum and minimum LV attenuation, and LV-myocardial CNR were not significantly different among three groups. In protocol A, both endocardial and epicardial contours were clearly delineated, and cardiac functional analysis was feasible in all cases. Average attenuation and visualization of the coronary vessels were not significantly different among groups. The diagnostic accuracies in detection of coronary stenosis were 92%, 93%, and 91%, respectively, for protocols A, B, and C.

CONCLUSION. The long-duration contrast injection protocol with diluted contrast material is optimal for assessing the coronary vessels and cardiac function.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • contrast media • MDCT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson, H. K. Pannu, and E. K. Fishman
IV Contrast Infusion for Coronary Artery CT Angiography: Literature Review and Results of a Nationwide Survey
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): W214 - W221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. J. M. Kroft, A. de Roos, and J. Geleijns
Artifacts in ECG-Synchronized MDCT Coronary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 581 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.