AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lauzon, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frayne, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lauzon, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frayne, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1157
AJR 2006; 187:649-657
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Time-Efficient Breath-Hold Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T

M. Louis Lauzon1, Houman Mahallati1 and Richard Frayne1

1 All authors: Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, The Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403-29th St. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 2T9.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to increase the allowed number of acquired slices per unit time (i.e., time efficiency) for high-power deposition breath-hold abdominal acquisitions at 3.0 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Abdominal MRI protocols include various T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced acquisitions that require extended spatial coverage and resolution. Ideally, each acquisition is completed within one breath-hold. At 3.0 T, power deposition (i.e., specific absorption rate [SAR]) concerns can limit achieving these conflicting needs because conventional sequences are based on 6-minute time-average SAR requirements. We optimized abdominal-specific sequences based on an approved short-term 10-second time-average SAR criterion and added a delay time after breath-holding to fulfill the long-term 6-minute time-average power deposition regulation.

RESULTS. Using our strategy, image acquisition time efficiency at 3.0 T was increased approximately twofold compared with conventional abdominal breath-hold pulse sequences for 2D dual-echo gradient-recalled echo, single-shot fast spin-echo, and 3D steady-state free precession sequences. Volunteers experienced a slight sensation of warmth for the single-shot fast spin-echo implementation, the most SAR-intensive sequence.

CONCLUSION. Our optimization strategy is not vendor-specific, is easily implemented for all conventional scanners (provided one can access and modify the pulse sequences directly, or the vendors can make the necessary changes), yields a higher slice-per-unit-time imaging efficiency, and still satisfies all the regulatory power deposition requirements.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • MR technique • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. B. Stafford, M. Sabati, M. J. Haakstad, H. Mahallati, and R. Frayne
Unenhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries with Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Dixon Method
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 243 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.