| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich, Grosshadern Campus,
Marchioninistr. 15, Munich 81377, Germany.
2 CT Division, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the dose reduction potential of combined online (x- and y-axes) and topogram-based (l) X-ray tube current modulation in CT colonography in a screening population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty asymptomatic individuals underwent CT colonography screening for colon polyps. A 16-MDCT scanner (Somatom Sensation 16) was used. Forty patients were examined at 120 kVp and 120 effective mAs (supine) and 40 effective mAs (prone) using online x- and y-axis tube current modulation. Another 40 patients were scanned using combined x-, y-, and z-axis tube current modulation. Individual patient radiation exposure was determined using the dose-length product. Image noise was determined by Hounsfield unit measurements in the colonic lumen at four anatomic levels. Image quality was rated on a 5-point confidence scale by two independent reviewers. The unpaired Student's t test (for radiation dose, image noise) and Wilcoxon's test (for image quality) were used to test for statistically significant differences between these values.
RESULTS. Radiation dose was significantly lower in the patient group scanned with x-, y-, and z-axis tube current modulation than in the group scanned with x- and y-axis tube current modulation (supine: 4.24 vs 6.50 mSv, p < 0.0001; prone: 1.61 vs 2.38 mSv, p < 0.0001). Radiation dose was reduced by 35% (supine) and 33% (prone). No statistically significant difference was seen in overall image noise (supine: 15.9 vs 16.3 H, p = 0.13; prone: 23.5 vs 24.8 H, p = 0.44) or image quality (supine: 4.6 vs 4.5, p = 0.62; prone: 3.5 vs 3.6, p = 0.54).
CONCLUSION. Combined x-, y-, and z-axis tube current modulation leads to a significant reduction of radiation exposure in CT colonography without loss of image quality.
Keywords: colonography • CT • dose reduction • MDCT • radiation dose • screening • tube current modulation
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E.J. Lee, S.K. Lee, R. Agid, P. Howard, J.M. Bae, and K. terBrugge Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1754 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. K. Hara, R. G. Paden, A. C. Silva, J. L. Kujak, H. J. Lawder, and W. Pavlicek Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at CT: Feasibility Study Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 764 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Graser, T. R. C. Johnson, E. M. Hecht, C. R. Becker, C. Leidecker, M. Staehler, C. G. Stief, H. Hildebrandt, M. C. B. Godoy, M. E. Finn, et al. Dual-Energy CT in Patients Suspected of Having Renal Masses: Can Virtual Nonenhanced Images Replace True Nonenhanced Images? Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 433 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.S.P. Tan, K.-L. Tan, J.C.L. Lee, C.-M. Wan, J.-L. Leong, and L.-L. Chan Comparison of Eye Lens Dose on Neuroimaging Protocols between 16- and 64-Section Multidetector CT: Achieving the Lowest Possible Dose AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 373 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Graser, P Stieber, D Nagel, C Schafer, D Horst, C R Becker, K Nikolaou, A Lottes, S Geisbusch, H Kramer, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population Gut, February 1, 2009; 58(2): 241 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Israel, S. Herlihy, A. N. Rubinowitz, D. Cornfeld, and J. Brink Does a Combination of Dose Modulation with Fast Gantry Rotation Time Limit CT Image Quality? Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 140 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E J HALL and D J BRENNER Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 362 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Imai, M Ikeda, S Wada, Y Enchi, and T Niimi Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. M. Tolan, E. M. Armstrong, and A. H. Chapman Replacing Barium Enema with CT Colonography in Patients Older Than 70 Years: The Importance of Detecting Extracolonic Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1104 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. D. Cody and M. Mahesh AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorials AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Technologic Advances in Multidetector CT with a Focus on Cardiac Imaging RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1829 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
