HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, Y. K. Articles by Lee, S. Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, Y. K. Articles by Lee, S. Y. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Value of Adding T1-Weighted Image to MR Cholangiopancreatography for Detecting Intrahepatic Biliary Stones

¹ Department of Diagnostic Radioology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam dong, Jeonju, Chonbuk, South Korea.
² Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
³ Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Chonbuk, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of adding a T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to detect bile duct stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. During a 30-month period, 148 patients suspected of having biliary stones and who underwent MRI including MRCP, a fat-suppressed T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence, and an axial HASTE sequence were enrolled in this study. The biliary stones were confirmed by ERCP, surgery, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Of these 148 patients, 73 had extrahepatic stones, 45 had intrahepatic stones, 20 had both extrahepatic and intrahepatic stones, and 10 had no biliary stones. Two separate sets of images, the MRCP set (composed of MRCP and axial HASTE) and the combined interpretion of the MRCP set and the T1-weighted image, were analyzed independently and separately by two observers. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic method. The sensitivity and specificity were also calculated.

RESULTS. For common duct stones, the diagnostic accuracy and the sensitivity of both image sets showed similar values without any significant difference (0.998 [97.8%] for the combined interpretation; 0.988 [97.8%] for observer 1 and 0.995 [96.8%] for observer 2 for the MRCP set). However, for the intrahepatic stones, the diagnostic accuracy (0.993) and the sensitivity (98.5%) of the combined interpretation were significantly higher than those of the MRCP set for the two observers (0.926 [83.8%] for observer 1 and 0.922 [85.3%] for observer 2) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was seen in the specificity of the two image sets for both the intrahepatic and the common duct stones.

CONCLUSION. Combining the axial T1-weighted image with MRCP is valuable for detecting intrahepatic stones.

Keywords: biliary system • MR cholangiopancreatography • MRI • MR technique • T1-weighted image

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. R. Nandalur, H. K. Hussain, W. J. Weadock, E. J. Wamsteker, T. D. Johnson, A. S. Khan, A. R. D'Amico, M. K. Ford, S. R. Nandalur, and T. L. Chenevert Possible Biliary Disease: Diagnostic Performance of High-Spatial-Resolution Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 883 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]