AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishigami, K.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishigami, K.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1114
AJR 2006; 187:1002-1009
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Accessory Left Gastric Artery from Left Hepatic Artery Shown on MDCT and Conventional Angiography: Correlation with CT Hepatic Arteriography

Kousei Ishigami1, Kengo Yoshimitsu1, Hiroyuki Irie1, Tsuyoshi Tajima1, Yoshiki Asayama1, Masakazu Hirakawa1 and Hiroshi Honda1

1 All authors: Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT and conventional angiography in the detection of an accessory left gastric artery using CT hepatic arteriography as the standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study group consisted of 118 patients who underwent MDCT with a triple-phase liver protocol with a slice thickness of 5 mm, conventional angiography, and CT hepatic arteriography. The early-phase images of MDCT and conventional angiography were retrospectively reviewed. The presence or absence of an accessory left gastric artery was evaluated using CT hepatic arteriography as the standard of reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MDCT and conventional angiography were calculated.

RESULTS. CT hepatic arteriography revealed an accessory left gastric artery in 25 (21.2%) of 118 cases, including 15 proximal- and 10 distal-type accessory left gastric arteries. On MDCT, there were seven false-negative cases and one false-positive case. Six of the seven false-negative cases were a proximal-type accessory left gastric artery, and nine of 10 distal-type accessory left gastric arteries were correctly diagnosed using MDCT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MDCT were 72.0%, 98.9%, and 93.2%, respectively. On conventional angiography, there were three false-negative and two false-positive cases, none of whom underwent selective left hepatic arteriography. Two of the three false-negative cases were the distal-type accessory left gastric artery, but eight of the 10 distal-type accessory left gastric arteries were correctly diagnosed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional angiography were 88.0%, 97.8%, and 95.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION. Approximately 70% of accessory left gastric arteries can be diagnosed at the early phase of MDCT even with a slice thickness of 5 mm.

Keywords: Anatomy • Ct Arteriography • Digital Subtraction Angiography • Gastric Arteries • Hemodynamics • Hepatic Arteries • Mdct Angiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.