HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bruzzi, J. F. Articles by Munden, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bruzzi, J. F. Articles by Munden, R. F. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Incidental Findings on Integrated PET/CT That Do Not Accumulate ¹⁸F-FDG

¹ All authors: Department of Thoracic Imaging, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 0371, Houston, TX 77030-4095.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence of abnormalities that do not show increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake on the CT component of integrated PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from all PET/CT studies performed consecutively between April and October 2003 on patients with non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed. All abnormalities present on the CT component of the PET/CT scans that did not show abnormally increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake were documented.

RESULTS. Three hundred twenty-one patients with non-small cell lung cancer (179 men, 142 women; mean age, 67 years; age range, 38-91 years) underwent initial staging (198/321 [62%]) or restaging (123/321 [38%]) PET/CT imaging during the study period. In 263 (82%) of the patients, CT showed 1,231 abnormalities that were not ¹⁸F-FDG avid. The abnormalities were located in the thorax (n = 650), abdomen and pelvis (n = 444), head and neck (n = 69), and bony skeleton (n = 68). In total, 298 (24%) of the abnormalities that were not ¹⁸F-FDG avid were located outside the range of a standard thoracic CT scan. The clinical importance of these abnormalities was classified as major (n = 48 [4%]), moderate (n = 465 [38%]), or minor (n = 718 [58%]). Four (1%) of the patients had findings of major clinical importance that did not show increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and were previously unsuspected.

CONCLUSION. Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing PET/CT, there is a high prevalence of CT abnormalities that do not show correlative ¹⁸F-FDG avidity but that may be clinically important.

Keywords: CT • ¹⁸F-FDG PET • incidental abnormalities • lung cancer • PET • PET/CT

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. Bruzzi, R. F. Munden, M. T. Truong, E. M. Marom, B. S. Sabloff, G. W. Gladish, R. B. Iyer, T.-S. Pan, H. A. Macapinlac, and J. J. Erasmus PET/CT of Esophageal Cancer: Its Role in Clinical Management RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1635 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]