HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Magee, T. Articles by Williams, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Magee, T. Articles by Williams, D. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

3.0-T MRI of the Supraspinatus Tendon

¹ Both authors: Department of Radiology, Neuroskeletal Imaging, 255 N Sykes Creek Pkwy., Merritt Island, FL 32953.

OBJECTIVE. MRI of the shoulder has been found to be highly sensitive and specific for detection of full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears at 1.5-T or lower field strength compared with arthroscopy. MRI of the shoulder at 3.0 T has not been specifically assessed. This study assesses the sensitivity and specificity of MRI at 3.0 T for supraspinatus tendon tears compared with arthroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR images of the shoulder in 150 consecutive patients who had subsequent arthroscopy. All patients had oblique coronal and sagittal T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted axial, oblique coronal, and sagittal imaging performed.

The radiologists interpreted the MR images by consensus without knowledge of the arthroscopy results. Scans were interpreted for full-thickness or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. If partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears were seen on MRI, the reviewers noted whether the partial-thickness tear was articular or bursal in location. The radiologists also separated the supraspinatus tendon tears into small (< 1 cm retraction from the humeral head) and large (> 1 cm retraction from the humeral head).

All 150 patients went on to arthroscopy. After consensus review of the MR images, arthroscopy results were compared with consensus MR interpretations.

RESULTS. Ninety-eight of the 150 patients had full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears at arthroscopy. Twenty-six of the 150 patients had partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. Seventeen of these 26 partial-thickness tears were along the articular surface and nine were along the bursal surface.

Ninety-six of 98 full-thickness tears seen at arthroscopy were seen on consensus MRI interpretation. All 26 partial-thickness tears seen at arthroscopy were seen at consensus MR interpretation; however, two of the partial-thickness articular surface tears seen at arthroscopy were interpreted as full-thickness tears on consensus MRI interpretation.

Twenty-eight of the 98 full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears were small tears (< 1 cm retraction from the humeral head) on arthroscopy. Two of these 28 small tears seen on arthroscopy were not seen on consensus MRI interpretation. Twenty-six patients had intact supraspinatus tendons on both retrospective consensus MRI interpretation and at arthroscopy.

CONCLUSION. MRI of the shoulder at 3.0 T is highly sensitive and specific compared with arthroscopy in the detection of full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears.

Keywords: MRI • musculoskeletal imaging • shoulder • supraspinatus tendon

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. O. de Jesus, L. Parker, A. J. Frangos, and L. N. Nazarian Accuracy of MRI, MR Arthrography, and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1701 - 1707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Oh, Y. C. Yoon, J. W. Kwon, S.-H. Choi, J. Y. Jung, S. Bae, and J. Yoo Comparison of Indirect Isotropic MR Arthrography and Conventional MR Arthrography of Labral Lesions and Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Study Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2009; 192(2): 473 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Magee 3-T MRI of the Shoulder: Is MR Arthrography Necessary? Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 86 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Rees The pathogenesis and surgical treatment of tears of the rotator cuff J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2008; 90-B(7): 827 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. N. Vinson, C. A. Helms, and L. D. Higgins Rim-Rent Tear of the Rotator Cuff: A Common and Easily Overlooked Partial Tear Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 943 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]