HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by De Smet, A. A. Articles by Tuite, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by De Smet, A. A. Articles by Tuite, M. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Use of the "Two-Slice-Touch" Rule for the MRI Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears

¹ Both authors: Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Hospital, Radiology - E3/311, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792.

OBJECTIVE. We reviewed our experience with knee MRI to determine if using the "two-slice-touch" rule increased our positive predictive value for diagnosing meniscal tears. This rule classifies a meniscus as torn if there are two or more MR images with abnormal findings and as possibly torn if there is only one MR image with an abnormal finding. We also compared our sensitivity and specificity using fast spin-echo imaging with previously reported studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the medical records of 174 patients who had knee MR examinations and correlative knee arthroscopy to determine our accuracy when we diagnosed menisci as torn, possibly torn, or intact using knee arthroscopy as the gold standard.

RESULTS. Our positive predictive value increased from 91% to 94% (p = 0.37) for medial meniscal tears and from 83% to 96% (p = 0.02) for lateral meniscal tears when using the two-slice-touch rule compared with the standard criterion of diagnosing a meniscus as torn if one or more images are abnormal. When using the standard criterion, we had 95% sensitivity and 85% specificity for diagnosing medial meniscal tears and 77% sensitivity and 89% specificity for diagnosing lateral meniscal tears.

CONCLUSION. When using the two-slice-touch rule, we had an increased positive predictive value for diagnosing menisci as torn, which was statistically significant for the lateral meniscus. Our accuracy using the standard criterion with fast spin-echo imaging was comparable to that reported in previous studies with spin-echo imaging.

Keywords: biomedical statistics • knee • meniscal tears • MRI • musculoskeletal imaging

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Englund, A. Guermazi, D. Gale, D. J. Hunter, P. Aliabadi, M. Clancy, and D. T. Felson Incidental Meniscal Findings on Knee MRI in Middle-Aged and Elderly Persons N. Engl. J. Med., September 11, 2008; 359(11): 1108 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y. Lee, W.-H. Jee, and J.-M. Kim Radial Tear of the Medial Meniscal Root: Reliability and Accuracy of MRI for Diagnosis Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 81 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. De Smet, D. H. Nathan, B. K. Graf, B. A. Haaland, and J. P. Fine Clinical and MRI Findings Associated with False-Positive Knee MR Diagnoses of Medial Meniscal Tears Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. De Smet and R. Mukherjee Clinical, MRI, and Arthroscopic Findings Associated with Failure to Diagnose a Lateral Meniscal Tear on Knee MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Lee, C.-Y. Tzeng, and Y.-M. Lin Specificity Gains at the Expense of Sensitivity and Vice Versa Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W574 - W574. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. De Smet and M. Tuite Reply Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W575 - W575. [Full Text] [PDF]