HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Terra, M. P. Articles by Stoker, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Terra, M. P. Articles by Stoker, J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

MRI in Evaluating Atrophy of the External Anal Sphincter in Patients with Fecal Incontinence

¹ Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1105 AZ.
² Department of Radiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
³ Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
⁴ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
⁵ Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. External anal sphincter atrophy seen at endoanal MRI may predict poor outcome of surgical anal sphincter repair for an external anal sphincter defect. The purposes of this study were to compare external phased-array MRI to endoanal MRI for depicting external anal sphincter atrophy in patients with fecal incontinence and to evaluate observer reproducibility in detecting external anal sphincter atrophy with these techniques.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty patients with fecal incontinence (23 women, seven men; mean age, 58.7 years; age range, 37-78 years) underwent both endoanal and external phased-array MRI. Images were evaluated for external anal sphincter atrophy by three radiologists. Measures of differences and agreement between both MRI techniques and of interobserver and intraobserver agreement of both techniques were calculated.

RESULTS. The MRI techniques did not significantly differ in their ability to depict external anal sphincter atrophy (p = 0.63) with good agreement ( = 0.72). Interobserver agreement was moderate ( = 0.53-0.56) for endoanal MRI and moderate to good ( = 0.55-0.8) for external phased-array MRI. Intraobserver agreement was moderate to very good ( = 0.57-0.86) for endoanal MRI and fair to very good ( = 0.31-0.86) for external phased-array MRI.

CONCLUSION. External phased-array MRI is comparable to endoanal MRI in depicting external anal sphincter atrophy and, thereby, in selecting patients for anal sphincter repair. Because results among interpreters varied considerably depending on the experience level, both techniques can be recommended in the diagnostic workup of fecal incontinence only if sufficient experience is available.

Keywords: anus • atrophy • external anal sphincter • gastrointestinal radiology • incontinence • MRI • pelvic imaging • pelvis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. C. Dobben, R. J. F. Felt-Bersma, F. J. W. ten Kate, and J. Stoker Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Anal Sphincter in Fecal Incontinence Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 671 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]