AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adzick, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danzer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adzick, N. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0152
AJR 2006; 187:W350-W356
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Diagnosis and Characterization of Fetal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma with Prenatal MRI

Enrico Danzer1, Anne M. Hubbard2, Holly L. Hedrick1, Mark P. Johnson1, R. Douglas Wilson1, Lori J. Howell1, Alan W. Flake1 and N. Scott Adzick1

1 The Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399.
2 University of Nebraska Medical Center, 981045 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68199-1045.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prenatal MRI provides additional information about fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma compared with prenatal sonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-two pregnant women with fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma underwent prenatal MRI (mean gestational age, 23 weeks). The size, location, mass characteristics, and compressive effects of the tumors were determined and correlated with sonography and postnatal findings.

RESULTS. Based on the MRI findings, the following American Academy of Pediatrics, Surgical Section classifications were assigned: type I in six patients, type II in 12, and type III in four. No type IV tumors were found. The sacrococcygeal teratoma appeared entirely cystic in five fetuses, microcystic in one, mixed cystic and solid in 12, and solid in four. The diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma was accurate in all cases assessed at our center using both MRI and sonography. Two additional patients initially referred with the diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma had a different diagnosis at reevaluation at our institution (healthy, n = 1; myelomeningocele, n = 1). MRI was superior to sonography for detecting displacement of the colon (n = 11), urinary tract dilatation (n = 9), hip dislocation (n = 4), intraspinal extension (n = 2), and vaginal dilation (n = 1). In fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma types II and III, MRI better showed the cephalic extent of the tumor compared with sonography. MRI findings were confirmed at surgery or autopsy in all patients. Three fetuses with high output cardiac physiology underwent open fetal resection of the tumor at 21-, 24-, and 26-weeks' gestational age with two surviving.

CONCLUSION. Our results show that ultrafast fetal MRI is a useful adjunct to the prenatal evaluation of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Compared with sonography, MRI more accurately characterized the intrapelvic and abdominal extent of the tumors and provided more information on compression of adjacent organs. The additional anatomic resolution provided by MRI resulted in more accurate prenatal counseling and improved preoperative planning for surgical resection.

Keywords: fetal imaging • fetal intervention • fetus • prenatal MRI • sacrococcygeal teratoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
R. A. Barth and E. Rubesova
Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Anomalies of the Neck, Chest, and Abdomen
NeoReviews, August 1, 2007; 8(8): e313 - e335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.