AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1954
AJR 2006; 187:1151-1155
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Commentary

Radiology Reporting: Returning to Our Image-Centric Roots

Bruce Reiner1 and Eliot Siegel1

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, 10 N Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Despite extraordinary advances in imaging and information technologies, the form and content of radiology reporting has changed little in the discipline's more than 100-year history. In this commentary, we outline the challenges that have confronted innovations such as speech recognition and structured reporting and call for a radical rethinking of the reporting process. By combining new applications with the expanding power of radiology and hospital information systems, the attention of the radiologist—and his or her referring colleagues—could be more focused on the image and its meaning.

CONCLUSION. One promising result of such a change in focus could be improved and more reliable communication, already an area of heightened concern in the imaging community. Moreover, such a shift away from the printed word to image-centered content could lead to benefits in shared image viewing; more streamlined and timely reporting; data mining of aggregate results; and image archives, and, ultimately, enhancement of the consultative value of the radiologist's contribution to patient care and treatment.

Keywords: communication • digital images • PACS • radiology practice • radiology reporting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Pochaczevsky
Image-Annotated Radiographic Reports
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W576 - W576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Stanley
What Does "Good Medicine" Mean?
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1145 - 1145.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Replacing traditional text radiology reports with image-centric reports: a shift from epiphany to enigma?
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1156 - 1159.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.