AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jhaveri, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Haider, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jhaveri, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Haider, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1022
AJR 2006; 187:1303-1308
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Comparison of CT Histogram Analysis and Chemical Shift MRI in the Characterization of Indeterminate Adrenal Nodules

Kartik S. Jhaveri1, Fenella Wong2, Sangeet Ghai3 and Masoom A. Haider1

1 Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave., Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
3 Main X-ray Department, City General Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE. Adrenal nodules having an attenuation of more than 10 H on unenhanced CT are considered indeterminate. The purpose of this study was to compare CT histogram analysis and chemical shift MRI in the characterization of indeterminate adrenal nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-nine adrenal masses that were indeterminate on CT were identified in 37 patients. Histogram analysis was performed on unenhanced CT from a region of interest (ROI) that recorded mean attenuation, number of pixels, and percentage of negative pixels. MR signal intensity drop between the in- and opposed-phase images was measured for the masses. Analyses to determine whether correlations existed among the mean CT attenuation, percentage of negative pixels, and MR signal intensity drop were performed. A final diagnosis was obtained by pathology results, follow-up of more than 6 months, or adrenal washout CT findings.

RESULTS. Negative pixels were present in 25 of 28 adenomas and nine of 11 nonadenomas. A threshold of more than 10% negative pixels for the diagnosis of adenoma provided a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 100%. A threshold of more than 20% MR signal intensity drop yielded a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 100%. An increase in the percentage of negative pixels was correlated with a decrease in mean CT attenuation. Using MRI, observers characterized seven additional nodules as adenomas compared with CT histogram analysis (McNemar test, {chi}2 = 5.1429; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION. CT histogram analysis with a threshold of a 10% negative pixel presence increases sensitivity for the characterization of adenomas compared with analysis of the mean CT attenuation alone. The use of chemical shift MRI with a threshold of 20% signal intensity drop results in a higher sensitivity than CT histogram analysis.

Keywords: adenoma • adrenal nodules • chemical shift MRI • CT histogram analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman
Adrenal Imaging with Multidetector CT: Evidence-based Protocol Optimization and Interpretative Practice
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1319 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. M. Ho, E. K. Paulson, M. J. Brady, T. Z. Wong, and S. T. Schindera
Lipid-Poor Adenomas on Unenhanced CT: Does Histogram Analysis Increase Sensitivity Compared with a Mean Attenuation Threshold?
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. A. Catalano, A. E. Samir, D. V. Sahani, and P. F. Hahn
Pixel Distribution Analysis: Can It be Used to Distinguish Clear Cell Carcinomas from Angiomyolipomas with Minimal Fat?
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 738 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.