AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bearcroft, P. W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bearcroft, P. W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1071
AJR 2006; 187:1327-1331
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

MRI of the Ankle: Effect on Diagnostic Confidence and Patient Management

Philip W. P. Bearcroft1, Suzanne Guy1, Michelle Bradley2 and Fred Robinson3

1 University Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 219, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom.
2 Centre for Applied Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR, United Kingdom.
3 Department of Orthopedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to quantify the impact that MRI of the ankle has on a surgeon's diagnosis and diagnostic confidence and on patient management.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A prospective controlled observational study was performed with 91 consecutive referrals (53 males, 38 females; age range, 13-76 years; mean age, 40.6 years) from a single orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon to a regional teaching hospital for ankle MRI. Measurements of diagnostic confidence using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were made both before and after the MRI examination in each case. Proposed management was also recorded before imaging and then with benefit of the MRI result. Finally, the surgeon provided a subjective statement regarding the perceived usefulness of the MRI examination when the patient was subsequently reviewed in the clinic.

RESULTS. There was a significant overall change in diagnostic confidence in 65 (71%) cases. The number of diagnoses reduced from an average per patient of 2.3 (95% CI, 2.09-2.44) to 1.2 (95% CI, 1.05-1.39), and in 157 (69%) of all diagnoses entertained, there was a significant change in the confidence with which they were considered after imaging. Management plans changed in 32 (35%) of the patients, and in 31% of those patients for whom plans were changed, a less invasive plan was adopted. Overall, the surgeon thought that understanding of the patient's disease had either depended on MRI or had been substantially improved by it in 60 (66%) cases.

CONCLUSION. MRI of the ankle influences clinicians' diagnoses and management plans.

Keywords: ankle • diagnostic confidence • MRI • orthopedic surgery


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.