AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, V. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1166
AJR 2006; 187:1361-1367
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Characterization of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: 18F-FDG PET Versus Nodule-Enhancement CT

Jared A. Christensen1, Mark A. Nathan1, Brian P. Mullan1, Thomas E. Hartman1, Stephen J. Swensen1 and Val J. Lowe1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to directly compare nodule-enhancement CT and 18F-FDG PET in the characterization of indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) greater than 7 mm in size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Examinations from patients undergoing both nodule-enhancement CT and 18F-FDG PET to characterize the same indeterminate SPN were reviewed. For nodule-enhancement CT, an SPN was considered malignant when it showed an unenhanced to peak contrast-enhanced increase in attenuation greater than 15 H. Fluourine-18-FDG PET studies were blindly reinterpreted by two qualified nuclear radiologists. SPNs qualitatively showing hypermetabolic activity greater than the mediastinal blood pool were interpreted as malignant. These interpretations were compared with the original prospective clinical readings and to semiquantitative standardized uptake value (SUV) analysis. Results were compared with pathologic and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS. Forty-two pulmonary nodules were examined. Twenty-five (60%) were malignant, and 17 (40%) were benign. Nodule-enhancement CT was positive in all 25 malignant nodules and in 12 benign nodules, with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 29%, respectively, and with a positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 68% and 100%, respectively. Qualitative 18F-FDG PET interpretations were positive in 24 of the 25 malignant nodules and in four benign nodules. Fluourine-18-FDG PET was considered negative in one malignant nodule and in 13 of the 17 benign nodules. This correlates with a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 76%, respectively, and with a PPV and NPV of 86% and 93%, respectively. Original prospective 18F-FDG PET and semiquantitative SUV analysis showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 88%, 76%, 85%, and 81% and 84%, 82%, 88%, and 78%, respectively.

CONCLUSION. Due to its much higher specificity and only slightly reduced sensitivity, 18F-FDG PET is preferable to nodule-enhancement CT in evaluating indeterminate pulmonary nodules. However, nodule-enhancement CT remains useful due to its high NPV, convenience, and lower cost. Qualitative 18F-FDG PET interpretation provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity when compared with original prospective interpretation or SUV analysis.

Keywords: chest • CT imaging • lung diseases • PET/CT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C.-J. Chen, B.-F. Lee, W.-J. Yao, L. Cheng, P.-S. Wu, C. L. Chu, and N.-T. Chiu
Dual-Phase 18F-FDG PET in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules with an Initial Standard Uptake Value Less Than 2.5
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 475 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Zou, M. Zhang, Q. Wang, D. Shang, L. Wang, and G. Yu
Quantitative Investigation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Histopathologic Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 252 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Y. Donmez, E. Yekeler, V. Saeidi, A. Tunaci, M. Tunaci, and G. Acunas
Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Patterns of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules on 3D Gradient-Recalled Echo MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1380 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Veronesi, M. Bellomi, U. Veronesi, G. Paganelli, P. Maisonneuve, P. Scanagatta, F. Leo, G. Pelosi, L. Travaini, C. Rampinelli, et al.
Role of Positron Emission Tomography Scanning in the Management of Lung Nodules Detected at Baseline Computed Tomography Screening
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 959 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.