AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0471
AJR 2006; 187:W490-W497
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Lower Tube Voltage Reduces Contrast Material and Radiation Doses on 16-MDCT Aortography

Yoshiharu Nakayama1, Kazuo Awai1, Yoshinori Funama2, Duo Liu1, Takeshi Nakaura1, Yoshitaka Tamura1 and Yasuyuki Yamashita1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
2 Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare aortic CT angiography performed at a low tube voltage and reduced dose of contrast material with standard-voltage, standard-contrast-dose CT angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We evaluated 74 patients for aortic disease on MDCT angiography (collimation, 16 x 1.5 mm; beam pitch, 0.9). In 36 patients, we used the standard tube voltage (120 kVp) and a contrast dose of 100 mL (300 mg I/mL) (protocol 1), and in the remaining 38 patients we applied a reduced tube voltage (90 kVp) and a contrast dose of 40 mL (300 mg I/mL) (protocol 2). The patients' weights, CT attenuation of the aorta, visualization of the celiac axis and renal artery, and graininess and streak artifacts on transverse CT scans were evaluated and recorded for each data set. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also measured. For statistical analysis, we used the two-tailed Student's t test and logistic regression; agreement between measurements recorded independently by two blinded reviewers was assessed using Cohen kappa statistics.

RESULTS. In both protocols a negative correlation was seen between patient weight and CT attenuation. In three protocol 1 patients weighing more than 70 kg, CT attenuation was less than 200 H. No difference was seen between the two protocols with respect to mean attenuation of the aorta (p = 0.13) or visualization of the celiac axis and renal artery (p = 0.35 and 0.60, respectively). Although the SNR and CNR were significantly higher in protocol 1 than in protocol 2, qualitative evaluation of graininess and streak artifacts showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.15 and 0.48, respectively). Interobserver agreement for quality assessments was within an acceptable range ({kappa} = 0.42-0.80).

CONCLUSION. Low-contrast and low-voltage scans are appropriate for lighter patients (< 70 kg in body weight) with aortic disease. Moreover, this method is particularly valuable for follow-up studies of heavier patients (> 70 kg) with renal dysfunction.

Keywords: aortography • arteriography • contrast media • CT • radiation dose • tube voltage


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Z. Szucs-Farkas, M. Semadeni, S. Bensler, M. A. Patak, G. von Allmen, P. Vock, and S. T. Schindera
Endoleak Detection with CT Angiography in an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Phantom: Effect of Tube Energy, Simulated Patient Size, and Physical Properties of Endoleaks
Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 590 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. T. Boll, E. M. Merkle, E. K. Paulson, R. A. Mirza, and T. R. Fleiter
Calcified Vascular Plaque Specimens: Assessment with Cardiac Dual-Energy Multidetector CT in Anthropomorphically Moving Heart Phantom1
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. H. de Vries, H. W. Venema, J. Florie, C. Y. Nio, and J. Stoker
Influence of Tagged Fecal Material on Detectability of Colorectal Polyps at CT: Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): W181 - W189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. T. Boll, E. M. Merkle, E. K. Paulson, R. A. Mirza, and T. R. Fleiter
Calcified Vascular Plaque Specimens: Assessment with Cardiac Dual-Energy Multidetector CT in Anthropomorphically Moving Heart Phantom
Radiology, August 18, 2008; (2008) 2483071576.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.-Y. Yang, Y.-F. Chen, C.-W. Lee, A. Huang, Y. Shen, C. Wei, and H.-M. Liu
Multiphase CT Angiography versus Single-Phase CT Angiography: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1288 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. T. Boll, E. M. Merkle, E. K. Paulson, and T. R. Fleiter
Coronary Stent Patency: Dual-Energy Multidetector CT Assessment in a Pilot Study with Anthropomorphic Phantom
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 687 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.