AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saddik, D.
Right arrow Articles by Howells, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saddik, D.
Right arrow Articles by Howells, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1465
AJR 2006; 187:W507-W511
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Prevalence and Location of Acetabular Sublabral Sulci at Hip Arthroscopy with Retrospective MRI Review

Daniel Saddik1,2, John Troupis2,3, Phillip Tirman4, John O'Donnell5 and Robert Howells5

1 Department of Radiology, The Northern Hospital, 185 Cooper St., Epping, Victoria 3076, Australia.
2 Symbion Health Limited, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
3 Department of Radiology, The Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.
4 California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
5 Orthopedic Clinic and Mercy Health, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence and location of acetabular sublabral sulci diagnosed as variants at hip arthroscopy and to provide a retrospective MRI review.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Two experienced hip arthroscopists noted the prevalence and location of acetabular labral sulci in 121 patients. The study population consisted of 57 males and 64 females with an average age of 43 years (range, 16-70 years). Of the 121 hip arthroscopies that showed sulci (22% of patients), correlation with the relevant MR studies (n = 27) was performed. Two radiologists who were aware of the arthroscopic findings reviewed the MR studies retrospectively, and agreement on imaging appearances was reached by consensus.

RESULTS. Arthroscopy revealed 30 sulci (25%) in 27 of the 121 patients. In those who had a single sulcus (25 patients), 11 (44%) were located anterosuperiorly, 12 (48%) posteroinferiorly, one (4%) anteroinferiorly, and one (4%) posterosuperiorly. The other two patients had more than one sulcus: one patient had one posterosuperior sulcus and one posteroinferior sulcus; and the other patient had one anterosuperior sulcus, one anteroinferior sulcus, and one posteroinferior sulcus. In total, of the 121 patients, the number and position of the sulci were 12 anterosuperior (10%), 14 posteroinferior (12%), two anteroinferior (2%), and two posterosuperior (2%). Of the 27 MR examinations, 24 were unenhanced and three studies were performed after intraarticular injection of gadolinium. In these 27 patients, a total of 30 sulci were detected at arthroscopy. On retrospective MR review of both the conventional and gadolinium-enhanced studies, nine (75%) of the 12 anterosuperior sulci could be visualized. Ten (71%) of the 14 posteroinferior sulci were also identified. Neither of the two anteroinferior sulci could be seen. Both of the posterosuperior sulci were evident. Of the conventional MR studies, of a potential of 27, 18 (70%) were identified on conventional imaging.

CONCLUSION. Sulci of the hip exist (22% of patients) and can be found at all anatomic positions (i.e., anterosuperior, anteroinferior, posterosuperior, and posteroinferior) of the hip. These sulci can be visualized on MRI with an accuracy of 70% using a nongadolinium technique.

Keywords: hip anatomy • hip arthroscopy • labral sulci • MRI • musculoskeletal imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. Studler, F. Kalberer, M. Leunig, M. Zanetti, J. Hodler, C. Dora, and C. W. A. Pfirrmann
MR Arthrography of the Hip: Differentiation between an Anterior Sublabral Recess as a Normal Variant and a Labral Tear
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 947 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.