AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0778
AJR 2006; 187:1521-1530
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

ADC Measurement of Abdominal Organs and Lesions Using Parallel Imaging Technique

Takeshi Yoshikawa1, Hideaki Kawamitsu2, Donald G. Mitchell1, Yoshiharu Ohno2, Yonson Ku3, Yasushi Seo4, Masahiko Fujii2 and Kazuro Sugimura2

1 Department of Radiology, Division of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St., Suite 1096, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
2 Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
3 Department of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
4 Department of Clinical Molecular Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the reliability and usefulness of parallel imaging for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement of abdominal organs and lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI (TE = 66, b = 0, 600 s/mm2) was performed in phantom and clinical studies. The b value was set to minimize the effects of perfusion in tissue and to maintain signal-to-noise ratio. Bottle phantoms were scanned with and without parallel imaging and with various parallel imaging factors and at various positions to evaluate the effects of parallel imaging on ADCs. In 200 consecutive clinical patients (122 men and 78 women: mean age, 61.9 years), ADCs were calculated for liver (four segments), spleen, pancreas (head, body, tail), gallbladder, renal parenchyma, and back muscle, and then compared to evaluate the reliability of clinical ADC measurements with parallel imaging. ADCs were also calculated for diffuse diseases and focal lesions (94 malignant and 93 benign) of abdominal organs to evaluate the clinical usefulness of ADC.

RESULTS. Location-dependent changes in water ADCs were minimal with parallel imaging factors first of 3, then of 4, and were small except for measurements at the image periphery. Acetone ADCs were saturated at 4.00 x 10-3 mm2/s. Degraded image quality prevented ADC measurement of the left hepatic lobe and pancreas in 7-18 patients. There was no significant difference among ADCs of four liver segments (1.50 ± 0.24 [SD] x 10-3 mm2/s - 1.56 ± 0.31 x 10-3 mm2/s) and between ADCs of the right and left kidneys (2.65 ± 0.30 x 10-3 mm2/s, 2.59 ± 0.33 x 10-3 mm2/s). ADC of the pancreas tail (1.65 ± 0.37 x 10-3 mm2/s) was significantly lower than those of the head (1.81 ± 0.40 x 10-3 mm2/s) and body (1.81 ± 0.41 x 10-3 mm2/s) (p < 0.005). Renal ADCs were significantly lower in patients with renal failure (right: 2.15 ± 0.30 x 10-3 mm2/s; left: 2.11 ± 0.25 x 10-3 mm2/s) than in those without disease (right: 2.67 ± 0.29 x 10-3 mm2/s; left: 2.60 ± 0.32 x 10-3 mm2/s) (p < 0.005). ADC of pancreatic cancer was significantly higher than that of healthy pancreas (p < 0.05). ADC of renal angiomyolipoma was significantly lower than those of renal cell carcinoma and healthy renal parenchyma (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION. Clinical ADC measurements of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging appear to be reliable and useful, and the effect of parallel imaging on calculated values is considered to be minimal.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, Y. Mazaheri Tehrani, L. Wang, N. M. Ishill, L. H. Schwartz, and H. Hricak
Renal Masses: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging--A Preliminary Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 458 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Parikh, S. J. Drew, V. S. Lee, S. Wong, E. M. Hecht, J. S. Babb, and B. Taouli
Focal Liver Lesion Detection and Characterization with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Comparison with Standard Breath-hold T2-weighted Imaging
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 812 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.