AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1032
AJR 2006; 187:1564-1570
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Isotropic 3D T2-Weighted MR Cholangiopancreatography with Parallel Imaging: Feasibility Study

Jingbo Zhang1, Gary M. Israel2, Elizabeth M. Hecht3, Glenn A. Krinsky4, James S. Babb3 and Vivian S. Lee3

1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., Rm. C278, New York, NY 10021.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520.
3 Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10021.
4 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Valley Health System, Ridgewood, NJ 07450.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of images obtained with fast 3D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) sequences and 1-mm isotropic voxels with the quality of conventional 2D MRCP images.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty consecutively registered patients (14 women, 16 men; average age, 60.2 years; age range, 32-87 years) underwent imaging at 1.5 T with a 6-element body array coil. All imaging was performed with three MRCP techniques: free-breathing 3D T2-weighted TSE (TR/TE, 1,300/680; flip angle, 180°; field of view, 250-300 mm; matrix size, 256 x 256; slice thickness, 1 mm; parallel acquisition technique factor, 2); breath-hold 3D T2-weighted TSE (same parameters as the free-breathing 3D technique); breath-hold coronal and oblique coronal thick-slab 2D TSE without parallel acquisition technique (2,800/1,100; flip angle, 150-180°). Quantitative measures of image signal and contrast were evaluated by analysis of variance and paired Student's t tests. A 5-point scale (1, nondiagnostic, to 5, high diagnostic confidence) was used to compare the 3D and 2D data sets for image quality and definition of biliary and pancreatic ductal anatomic features. Friedman's nonparametric and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests were performed for statistical analysis of the qualitative assessments.

RESULTS. Quantitative results showed free-breathing and breath-hold 3D TSE images had significantly higher relative signal intensity and contrast than 2D TSE images (p < 0.0001). The qualitative findings showed that both free-breathing and breath-hold 3D TSE techniques gave better delineation of biliary anatomy (p < 0.0001) than the 2D technique. The overall quality of 3D images was better than that of 2D images, and 3D imaging was better at depicting pancreatic ducts, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION. Three-dimensional volumetric MRCP images are of superior quality and give better delineation of pancreaticobiliary anatomy than conventional 2D images and have the added advantage of multiplanar and postprocessing capabilities.

Keywords: cholangiopancreatography • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A OTO, R ERNST, L GHULMIYYAH, D HUGHES, G SAADE, and G CHALJUB
The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobiliary disease
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2009; 82(976): 279 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. R. Nandalur, H. K. Hussain, W. J. Weadock, E. J. Wamsteker, T. D. Johnson, A. S. Khan, A. R. D'Amico, M. K. Ford, S. R. Nandalur, and T. L. Chenevert
Possible Biliary Disease: Diagnostic Performance of High-Spatial-Resolution Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 883 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Hosseinzadeh, A. Furlan, and O. Almusa
2D Thick-Slab MR Cholangiopancreatography: Does Parallel Imaging with Sensitivity Encoding Improve Image Quality and Duct Visualization?
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W327 - W334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Q. Knowlton, A. J. Taylor, M. Reichelderfer, and J. Stang
Imaging of Biliary Tract Inflammation: An Update
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 984 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.