AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saksena, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissleder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saksena, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissleder, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0873
AJR 2006; 187:W582-W588
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Original Research

Comparison of Lymphotropic Nanoparticle-Enhanced MRI Sequences in Patients with Various Primary Cancers

Mansi Saksena1, Mukesh Harisinghani1, Peter Hahn1, John Kim1, Anuradha Saokar1, Benjamin King1 and Ralph Weissleder1

1 All authors: Division of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114.

OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to empirically evaluate T2-weighted fast spin-echo, moderately T2*-weighted gradient-refocused echo (GRE), and heavily T2*-weighted GRE sequences to determine which sequence is the most effective for nodal characterization on lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI (LNMRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included 65 patients who had proven primary cancer and were scheduled for either surgical lymph node dissection or imaging-guided lymph node biopsy. All patients underwent LNMRI using T2-weighted fast spin-echo, moderately T2*-weighted GRE, and heavily T2*-weighted GRE sequences. Unequivocal correlation of histopathology and MRI could be made in 140 nodes and only these were included in the analysis. Two blinded reviewers performed qualitative analysis of the nodes. Alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with a continuous rating scale were plotted for each sequence for both reviewers and the diagnostic accuracy of fast spin-echo T2-weighted and GRE T2*-weighted images were compared by calculating the area under the curve (Az). A two-tailed Student's t test was performed to test the significance (p < 0.05) of the differences between the ROC curves derived from the three sequences.

RESULTS. Irrespective of reviewer experience, T2*-weighted sequences showed better nodal characterization when compared with T2-weighted sequences. For both reviewers, there was a statistically significant difference between the Az for T2- and the two T2*-weighted sequences (p < 0.05). Neither reviewer showed a statistically significant difference between the two T2*-weighted sequences.

CONCLUSION. GRE T2*-weighted sequences are superior for nodal characterization on LNMRI to fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences. Imaging protocols for LNMRI should include fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging for anatomic localization, but characterization of nodes should be based on their appearance on contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted images. The T2*-weighted images acquired with dual TE values, one of which is intermediate and the other longer, improve nodal characterization.

Keywords: cancer • lymph nodes • MR contrast agents • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.