AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sahani, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Saini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sahani, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Saini, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0583
AJR 2007; 188:115-120
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

16-MDCT Angiography in Living Kidney Donors at Various Tube Potentials: Impact on Image Quality and Radiation Dose

Dushyant V. Sahani1, Sanjeeva P. Kalva1, Peter F. Hahn1 and Sanjay Saini1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114-2696.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of 16-MDCT angiography at various peak kilovoltage (kVp) settings and the impact of the different settings on image quality and on radiation dose in adult kidney donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty-two renal donors (32 men, 30 women) who underwent 16-MDCT were divided into three groups: 18 subjects were studied at 140 kVp (group A); 20, at 120 kVp (group B); and 24, at 100 kVp (group C). Other constant scanning parameters were as follows: detector collimation, 0.625 mm; table feed, 9.375 mm/rotation; gantry rotation time, 500 milliseconds; and automatic current tube modulation (ATCM) using a noise index of 15. A total of 135-140 mL of iodinated contrast material (300 mg I/mL) was administered at 5 mL/s via an 18-gauge cannula, and arterial phase scanning was initiated using a bolus-tracking technique. Two observers evaluated image quality of the axial and 3D images and the visibility of branch order in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and renal arteries. Attenuation (in Hounsfield units [H]) in the aorta, SMA, and main renal artery was also measured by placing a region of interest. Radiation dose measurements were based on the scanner-generated CT dose index volume (CTDIvol). Each parameter tested was compared among the three groups using a nonparametric analysis of variance test, and a p value of 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS. Differences in the quality of the axial images existed between groups A and C (p < 0.001) and between groups B and C (p < 0.01); the image quality of the 3D images and the visibility of branch order in the SMA and renal arteries were comparable for all groups. The difference in mean attenuation of the aorta, SMA, and renal arteries was significant between groups A and C (p < 0.001) and between groups B and C (p < 0.01). All groups had 100% diagnostic accuracy in identifying the number of renal arteries on the side of nephrectomy. The mean radiation dose in CTDIvol was 25 ± 3 mGy at 140 kVp, 17 ± 4 mGy at 120 kVp, and 12 ± 3 mGy at 100 kVp (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION. Our initial observations suggest that the image quality of 16-MDCT angiography performed at 120 kVp is similar to that of CT angiography (CTA) performed at 140 kVp in adult kidney donors but with a significant radiation dose reduction. CTA at 100 kVp results in higher image noise but provides diagnostically acceptable images with significant radiation dose reduction compared with CTA at 120 or 140 kVp.

Keywords: kidney transplantation • MDCT angiography • oncologic imaging • radiation dose • renal artery


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. M. Yeh, J. A. Shepherd, Z. J. Wang, H. Seong Teh, R. P. Hartman, and S. Prevrhal
Dual-Energy and Low-kVp CT in the Abdomen
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Marin, R. C. Nelson, E. Samei, E. K. Paulson, L. M. Ho, D. T. Boll, D. M. DeLong, T. T. Yoshizumi, and S. T. Schindera
Hypervascular Liver Tumors: Low Tube Voltage, High Tube Current Multidetector CT during Late Hepatic Arterial Phase for Detection--Initial Clinical Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, T. Nakaura, S. Oda, Y. Funama, K. T. Bae, and Y. Yamashita
Effect of Contrast Injection Protocols with Dose Adjusted to the Estimated Lean Patient Body Weight on Aortic Enhancement at CT Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 1071 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. Siewert, J. Sosna, A. McNamara, V. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Quality Initiatives: Missed Lesions at Abdominal Oncologic CT: Lessons Learned from Quality Assurance
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 623 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.