HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, Y. J. Articles by Lu, D. S. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, Y. J. Articles by Lu, D. S. K. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotic Patients: Evaluation with Liver CT

¹ Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721.
² Present address: Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Korea.
³ Medical Imaging Informatics Group, UCLA Biomedical Informatics Center, Los Angeles, CA.
⁴ Division of Digestive Diseases and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of routine helical liver CT in the detection and grading of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 67 consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent both upper endoscopy and helical liver CT within a 4-week interval were evaluated. The CT protocol included unenhanced, arterial, and portal phases with a collimation of 7-7.5 mm. Two blinded abdominal imagers (6 and 7 years' experience) retrospectively interpreted all CT images to detect the presence of esophageal varices on a 5-point confidence scale and measure the largest varix identified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed, and the correlation between CT measurements and endoscopic grading, the reference standard, was assessed.

RESULTS. The variceal detection rates for the observers was 92% (11/12) and 92% (11/12) for large (i.e., clinically significant) varices, 53% (16/30) and 60% (18/30) for small varices, and 64% (27/42) and 69% (29/42) for all varices. The area under the ROC curve for the detection of esophageal varices of any size was 0.77 (observer 1) and 0.80 (observer 2). CT variceal grading showed a strong correlation with endoscopic grading for both observers (p 0.001). Using a variceal diameter threshold of 3 mm on CT, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for distinguishing large esophageal varices from small or no varices were 92% (11/12), 84% (46/55), and 85% (57/67), respectively, for both observers.

CONCLUSION. Liver CT is useful for the detection and grading of esophageal varices. A diameter of 3 mm may be an appropriate screening threshold for large clinically significant varices.

Keywords: cirrhosis • CT • esophageal varices • esophagus • liver disease

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. K. Kim, Y. Kim, and S. S. Shim Thoracic Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: Radiologic Findings RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 825 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. Y. Choi, K.-S. Suh, N.-J. Yi, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi Changes of Portosystemic Collaterals and Splenic Volume on CT After Liver Transplantation and Factors Influencing Those Changes Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): W8 - W16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]